Pedicle Screw With Increased Cortical Purchase Can Be Inserted With Same Accuracy as the Screw in Straightforward Trajectory Using 3D Modeling Landmarks.


Journal Article

STUDY DESIGN:Comparison, in terms of insertion accuracy and biomechanical performance, between an increased cortical purchase and straightforward pedicle screw trajectory. OBJECTIVE:This study aims to compare a trajectory with increased cortical purchase to the more common straightforward trajectory in terms of strength and insertion accuracy using real-time navigation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:In previous studies, it was suggested that pedicle screw pullout strength is strongly correlated with bone mineral density, and using a more cortical tract allows a greater portion of the denser bone, the cortex, to be in contact with the screw. In light of this advantage, an insertion technique has been proposed more recently, to increase the cortical purchase to maximize screw thread contact with cortical bone. It is performed inserting the screw with reduced transverse inclination and results in cortical bone purchase in the lateral portion of the pedicle. METHODS:Eight T1 and eight T3 vertebra models were reconstructed in Mimics Suite (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) using CT data obtained with a Medtronic O-arm. Using a previously developed computer algorithm, we calculated all achievable safe trajectories for pedicle screw placement ensuring a minimal distance of 0.5 mm between screw and pedicle edges. For both vertebrae, among these, the straightest and the most convergent trajectories with the calculated insertion region greater than 15% of the total were selected to safely instrument the vertebrae, respectively, as ICP and straightforward techniques. The straightforward technique was planned with a transverse angle of 22.50° in both vertebrae whereas the ICP was planned with a transverse angle of 12.50° for T1 and 2.5° for T3. The screws were implanted by a surgeon experienced in straightforward insertion, and other independent investigators measured placement accuracy and mechanical performance. RESULTS:The transverse screw angles for T1 and T3 with straightforward technique had average values of 24.93° ± 2.96° and 23.53° ± 2.70°, respectively. For the ICP technique, the average values were 15.60° ± 2.95° for T1 and 2.29° ± 1.55° for T3. The resultant errors associated with screw placement for T1 and T3 were not significantly different (p > .05). The pullout failure loads with straightforward techniques ranged from 756 ± 164 N in T1 to 703 ± 74 N in T3 and were not significantly different (p > .05) from the values of 699 ± 84 N for T1 and of 732 ± 113 N measured for the ICP. CONCLUSIONS:For the upper thoracic vertebrae tested, despite the use of shorter screws, the insertion technique with increased cortical purchase, in biomechanical terms, is comparable with the straightforward trajectory. Using guidance, the proposed ICP technique was performed with the same accuracy as the popular straightforward technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level V.

Full Text

Cited Authors

  • Szczodry, M; Solitro, GF; Amirouche, F; Patel, P

Published Date

  • January 2018

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 6 / 1

Start / End Page

  • 20 - 27

PubMed ID

  • 29287813

Pubmed Central ID

  • 29287813

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 2212-1358

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 2212-134X

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.06.004


  • eng