Why saying what you mean matters: An analysis of trauma team communication.

Published

Journal Article

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that team communication with unmatched grammatical form and communicative intent (mixed mode communication) would correlate with worse trauma teamwork. METHODS: Interdisciplinary trauma simulations were conducted. Team performance was rated using the TEAM tool. Team communication was coded for grammatical form and communicative intent. The rate of mixed mode communication (MMC) was calculated. MMC rates were compared to overall TEAM scores. Statements with advisement intent (attempts to guide behavior) and edification intent (objective information) were specifically examined. The rates of MMC with advisement intent (aMMC) and edification intent (eMMC) were also compared to TEAM scores. RESULTS: TEAM scores did not correlate with MMC or eMMC. However, aMMC rates negatively correlated with total TEAM scores (r = -0.556, p = 0.025) and with the TEAM task management component scores (r = -0.513, p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Trauma teams with lower rates of mixed mode communication with advisement intent had better non-technical skills as measured by TEAM.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Jung, HS; Warner-Hillard, C; Thompson, R; Haines, K; Moungey, B; LeGare, A; Shaffer, DW; Pugh, C; Agarwal, S; Sullivan, S

Published Date

  • February 2018

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 215 / 2

Start / End Page

  • 250 - 254

PubMed ID

  • 29153980

Pubmed Central ID

  • 29153980

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1879-1883

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.11.008

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States