Four-dimensional patient dose reconstruction for scanned ion beam therapy of moving liver tumors.

Published

Journal Article

PURPOSE: Estimation of the actual delivered 4-dimensional (4D) dose in treatments of patients with mobile hepatocellular cancer with scanned carbon ion beam therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Six patients were treated with 4 fractions to a total relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose of 40 Gy (RBE) using a single field. Respiratory motion was addressed by dedicated margins and abdominal compression (5 patients) or gating (1 patient). 4D treatment dose reconstructions based on the treatment records and the measured motion monitoring data were performed for the single-fraction dose and a total of 17 fractions. To assess the impact of uncertainties in the temporal correlation between motion trajectory and beam delivery sequence, 3 dose distributions for varying temporal correlation were calculated per fraction. For 3 patients, the total treatment dose was formed from the fractional distributions using all possible combinations. Clinical target volume (CTV) coverage was analyzed using the volumes receiving at least 95% (V95) and 107% (V107) of the planned doses. RESULTS: 4D dose reconstruction based on daily measured data is possible in a clinical setting. V95 and V107 values for the single fractions ranged between 72% and 100%, and 0% and 32%, respectively. The estimated total treatment dose to the CTV exhibited improved and more robust dose coverage (mean V95 > 87%, SD < 3%) and overdose (mean V107 < 4%, SD < 3%) with respect to the single-fraction dose for all analyzed patients. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable impact of interplay effects on the single-fraction CTV dose was found for most of the analyzed patients. However, due to the fractionated treatment, dose heterogeneities were substantially reduced for the total treatment dose. 4D treatment dose reconstruction for scanned ion beam therapy is technically feasible and may evolve into a valuable tool for dose assessment.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Richter, D; Saito, N; Chaudhri, N; Härtig, M; Ellerbrock, M; Jäkel, O; Combs, SE; Habermehl, D; Herfarth, K; Durante, M; Bert, C

Published Date

  • May 2014

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 89 / 1

Start / End Page

  • 175 - 181

PubMed ID

  • 24725700

Pubmed Central ID

  • 24725700

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1879-355X

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0360-3016

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.043

Language

  • eng