Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Published online

Journal Article (Review)

BACKGROUND: A rigorous and focused systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of individualised homeopathic treatment has not previously been undertaken. We tested the hypothesis that the outcome of an individualised homeopathic treatment approach using homeopathic medicines is distinguishable from that of placebos. METHODS: The review's methods, including literature search strategy, data extraction, assessment of risk of bias and statistical analysis, were strictly protocol-based. Judgment in seven assessment domains enabled a trial's risk of bias to be designated as low, unclear or high. A trial was judged to comprise 'reliable evidence' if its risk of bias was low or was unclear in one specified domain. 'Effect size' was reported as odds ratio (OR), with arithmetic transformation for continuous data carried out as required; OR > 1 signified an effect favouring homeopathy. RESULTS: Thirty-two eligible RCTs studied 24 different medical conditions in total. Twelve trials were classed 'uncertain risk of bias', three of which displayed relatively minor uncertainty and were designated reliable evidence; 20 trials were classed 'high risk of bias'. Twenty-two trials had extractable data and were subjected to meta-analysis; OR = 1.53 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22 to 1.91). For the three trials with reliable evidence, sensitivity analysis revealed OR = 1.98 (95% CI 1.16 to 3.38). CONCLUSIONS: Medicines prescribed in individualised homeopathy may have small, specific treatment effects. Findings are consistent with sub-group data available in a previous 'global' systematic review. The low or unclear overall quality of the evidence prompts caution in interpreting the findings. New high-quality RCT research is necessary to enable more decisive interpretation.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Mathie, RT; Lloyd, SM; Legg, LA; Clausen, J; Moss, S; Davidson, JRT; Ford, I

Published Date

  • December 6, 2014

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 3 /

Start / End Page

  • 142 -

PubMed ID

  • 25480654

Pubmed Central ID

  • 25480654

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 2046-4053

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1186/2046-4053-3-142

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • England