Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Rationale and design of the comParIson Of sacubitril/valsartaN versus Enalapril on Effect on nt-pRo-bnp in patients stabilized from an acute Heart Failure episode (PIONEER-HF) trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Velazquez, EJ; Morrow, DA; DeVore, AD; Ambrosy, AP; Duffy, CI; McCague, K; Hernandez, AF; Rocha, RA; Braunwald, E
Published in: Am Heart J
April 2018

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril in patients with heart failure (HF) with a reduced ejection fraction (EF) stabilized during hospitalization for acute decompensated HF. BACKGROUND: Sacubitril/valsartan, a first-in-class angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, improves survival among ambulatory HF patients with a reduced EF. However, there is very limited experience with the in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in patients who have been stabilized following hospitalization for acute decompensated HF. METHODS: PIONEER-HF is a 12-week, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial enrolling a planned 882 patients at more than 100 participating sites in the United States. Medically stable patients >18 years of age with an EF <40% and an amino terminal-pro b-type natriuretic peptide >1600 pg/mL or b-type natriuretic peptide >400 pg/mL are eligible for participation no earlier than 24 hours and up to 10 days from initial presentation while still hospitalized. Patients are randomly assigned 1:1 to in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan titrated to 97/103 mg by mouth twice daily versus enalapril titrated to 10 mg by mouth twice daily for 8 weeks. All patients receive open-label treatment with sacubitril/valsartan for the remaining 4 weeks of the study. The primary efficacy end point is the time-averaged proportional change in amino terminal-pro b-type natriuretic peptide from baseline through weeks 4 and 8. Secondary and exploratory end points include serum and urinary biomarkers as well as clinical outcomes. Safety end points include the incidence of angioedema, hypotension, renal insufficiency, and hyperkalemia. CONCLUSION: The PIONEER-HF trial will inform clinical practice by providing evidence on the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan among patients who have been stabilized following an admission for acute decompensated HF with a reduced EF.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Am Heart J

DOI

EISSN

1097-6744

Publication Date

April 2018

Volume

198

Start / End Page

145 / 151

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Valsartan
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Tetrazoles
  • Survival Rate
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Risk Assessment
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prognosis
  • Peptide Fragments
  • Patient Safety
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Velazquez, E. J., Morrow, D. A., DeVore, A. D., Ambrosy, A. P., Duffy, C. I., McCague, K., … Braunwald, E. (2018). Rationale and design of the comParIson Of sacubitril/valsartaN versus Enalapril on Effect on nt-pRo-bnp in patients stabilized from an acute Heart Failure episode (PIONEER-HF) trial. Am Heart J, 198, 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2018.01.004
Velazquez, Eric J., David A. Morrow, Adam D. DeVore, Andrew P. Ambrosy, Carol I. Duffy, Kevin McCague, Adrian F. Hernandez, Ricardo A. Rocha, and Eugene Braunwald. “Rationale and design of the comParIson Of sacubitril/valsartaN versus Enalapril on Effect on nt-pRo-bnp in patients stabilized from an acute Heart Failure episode (PIONEER-HF) trial.Am Heart J 198 (April 2018): 145–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2018.01.004.
Velazquez EJ, Morrow DA, DeVore AD, Ambrosy AP, Duffy CI, McCague K, Hernandez AF, Rocha RA, Braunwald E. Rationale and design of the comParIson Of sacubitril/valsartaN versus Enalapril on Effect on nt-pRo-bnp in patients stabilized from an acute Heart Failure episode (PIONEER-HF) trial. Am Heart J. 2018 Apr;198:145–151.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am Heart J

DOI

EISSN

1097-6744

Publication Date

April 2018

Volume

198

Start / End Page

145 / 151

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Valsartan
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Tetrazoles
  • Survival Rate
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Risk Assessment
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prognosis
  • Peptide Fragments
  • Patient Safety