The Rules of Engagement: CTTI Recommendations for Successful Collaborations Between Sponsors and Patient Groups Around Clinical Trials.

Journal Article (Journal Article)

OBJECTIVE:To identify the elements necessary for successful collaboration between patient groups and academic and industry sponsors of clinical trials, in order to develop recommendations for best practices for effective patient group engagement. METHODS:In-depth interviews, informed by a previously reported survey, were conducted to identify the fundamentals of successful patient group engagement. Thirty-two respondents from 3 sectors participated: patient groups, academic researchers, and industry. The findings were presented to a multistakeholder group of experts in January 2015. The expert group came to consensus on a set of actionable recommendations for best practices for patient groups and research sponsors. RESULTS:Interview respondents acknowledged that not all patient groups are created equal in terms of what they can contribute to a clinical trial. The most important elements for effective patient group engagement include establishing meaningful partnerships, demonstrating mutual benefits, and collaborating as partners from the planning stage forward. Although there is a growing appreciation by sponsors about the benefits of patient group engagement, there remains some resistance and some uncertainty about how best to engage. Barriers include mismatched expectations and a perception that patient groups lack scientific sophistication and that "wishful thinking" may cloud their recommendations. CONCLUSIONS:Patient groups are developing diverse skillsets and acquiring assets to leverage in order to become collaborators with industry and academia on clinical trials. Growing numbers of research sponsors across the clinical trials enterprise are recognizing the benefits of continuous and meaningful patient group engagement, but there are still mindsets to change, and stakeholders need further guidance on operationalizing a new model of clinical trial conduct.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Bloom, D; Beetsch, J; Harker, M; Hesterlee, S; Moreira, P; Patrick-Lake, B; Selig, W; Sherman, J; Smith, SK; Valentine, JE; Roberts, JN

Published Date

  • March 2018

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 52 / 2

Start / End Page

  • 206 - 213

PubMed ID

  • 29714514

Pubmed Central ID

  • PMC5846850

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 2168-4804

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 2168-4790

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1177/2168479017720247


  • eng