Skip to main content

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study To Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iclaprim versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections Suspected or Confirmed To Be Due to Gram-Positive Pathogens (REVIVE-2 Study).

Publication ,  Journal Article
Holland, TL; O'Riordan, W; McManus, A; Shin, E; Borghei, A; File, TM; Wilcox, MH; Torres, A; Dryden, M; Lodise, T; Oguri, T; Corey, GR ...
Published in: Antimicrob Agents Chemother
May 2018

Iclaprim is a novel diaminopyrimidine antibiotic that may be an effective and safe treatment for serious skin infections. The safety and effectiveness of iclaprim were assessed in a global phase 3, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled trial. Six hundred thirteen adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) suspected or confirmed to be due to Gram-positive pathogens were randomized to iclaprim (80 mg) or vancomycin (15 mg/kg of body weight), both of which were administered intravenously every 12 h for 5 to 14 days. The primary endpoint was a ≥20% reduction in lesion size compared with that at the baseline at 48 to 72 h after the start of administration of study drug in the intent-to-treat population. Among patients randomized to iclaprim, 78.3% (231 of 295) met this primary endpoint, whereas 76.7% (234 of 305) of those receiving vancomycin met this primary endpoint (difference, 1.58%; 95% confidence interval, -5.10% to 8.26%). This met the prespecified 10% noninferiority margin. Iclaprim was well tolerated, with most adverse events being categorized as mild. In conclusion, iclaprim was noninferior to vancomycin in this phase 3 clinical trial for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. On the basis of these results, iclaprim may be an efficacious and safe treatment for skin infections suspected or confirmed to be due to Gram-positive pathogens. (This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02607618.).

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Antimicrob Agents Chemother

DOI

EISSN

1098-6596

Publication Date

May 2018

Volume

62

Issue

5

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Vancomycin
  • Skin Diseases, Bacterial
  • Pyrimidines
  • Middle Aged
  • Microbiology
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Gram-Positive Bacteria
  • Female
  • Aged
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Holland, Thomas L., William O’Riordan, Alison McManus, Elliot Shin, Ali Borghei, Thomas M. File, Mark H. Wilcox, et al. “A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study To Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iclaprim versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections Suspected or Confirmed To Be Due to Gram-Positive Pathogens (REVIVE-2 Study).Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62, no. 5 (May 2018). https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02580-17.
Holland TL, O’Riordan W, McManus A, Shin E, Borghei A, File TM, Wilcox MH, Torres A, Dryden M, Lodise T, Oguri T, Corey GR, McLeroth P, Shukla R, Huang DB. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study To Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iclaprim versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections Suspected or Confirmed To Be Due to Gram-Positive Pathogens (REVIVE-2 Study). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 May;62(5).

Published In

Antimicrob Agents Chemother

DOI

EISSN

1098-6596

Publication Date

May 2018

Volume

62

Issue

5

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Vancomycin
  • Skin Diseases, Bacterial
  • Pyrimidines
  • Middle Aged
  • Microbiology
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Gram-Positive Bacteria
  • Female
  • Aged