Skip to main content

Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Wilt, TJ; Brawer, MK; Jones, KM; Barry, MJ; Aronson, WJ; Fox, S; Gingrich, JR; Wei, JT; Gilhooly, P; Grob, BM; Nsouli, I; Iyer, P; Snider, G ...
Published in: N Engl J Med
July 19, 2012

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of surgery versus observation for men with localized prostate cancer detected by means of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is not known. METHODS: From November 1994 through January 2002, we randomly assigned 731 men with localized prostate cancer (mean age, 67 years; median PSA value, 7.8 ng per milliliter) to radical prostatectomy or observation and followed them through January 2010. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; the secondary outcome was prostate-cancer mortality. RESULTS: During the median follow-up of 10.0 years, 171 of 364 men (47.0%) assigned to radical prostatectomy died, as compared with 183 of 367 (49.9%) assigned to observation (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.08; P=0.22; absolute risk reduction, 2.9 percentage points). Among men assigned to radical prostatectomy, 21 (5.8%) died from prostate cancer or treatment, as compared with 31 men (8.4%) assigned to observation (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.09; P=0.09; absolute risk reduction, 2.6 percentage points). The effect of treatment on all-cause and prostate-cancer mortality did not differ according to age, race, coexisting conditions, self-reported performance status, or histologic features of the tumor. Radical prostatectomy was associated with reduced all-cause mortality among men with a PSA value greater than 10 ng per milliliter (P=0.04 for interaction) and possibly among those with intermediate-risk or high-risk tumors (P=0.07 for interaction). Adverse events within 30 days after surgery occurred in 21.4% of men, including one death. CONCLUSIONS: Among men with localized prostate cancer detected during the early era of PSA testing, radical prostatectomy did not significantly reduce all-cause or prostate-cancer mortality, as compared with observation, through at least 12 years of follow-up. Absolute differences were less than 3 percentage points. (Funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program and others; PIVOT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00007644.).

Duke Scholars

Published In

N Engl J Med

DOI

EISSN

1533-4406

Publication Date

July 19, 2012

Volume

367

Issue

3

Start / End Page

203 / 213

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Watchful Waiting
  • Prostatic Neoplasms
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen
  • Prostate
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Numbers Needed To Treat
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Wilt, T. J., Brawer, M. K., Jones, K. M., Barry, M. J., Aronson, W. J., Fox, S., … Prostate Cancer Intervention versus Observation Trial (PIVOT) Study Group. (2012). Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med, 367(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1113162
Wilt, Timothy J., Michael K. Brawer, Karen M. Jones, Michael J. Barry, William J. Aronson, Steven Fox, Jeffrey R. Gingrich, et al. “Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.N Engl J Med 367, no. 3 (July 19, 2012): 203–13. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1113162.
Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, Barry MJ, Aronson WJ, Fox S, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203–13.
Wilt, Timothy J., et al. “Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.N Engl J Med, vol. 367, no. 3, July 2012, pp. 203–13. Pubmed, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113162.
Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, Barry MJ, Aronson WJ, Fox S, Gingrich JR, Wei JT, Gilhooly P, Grob BM, Nsouli I, Iyer P, Cartagena R, Snider G, Roehrborn C, Sharifi R, Blank W, Pandya P, Andriole GL, Culkin D, Wheeler T, Prostate Cancer Intervention versus Observation Trial (PIVOT) Study Group. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203–213.

Published In

N Engl J Med

DOI

EISSN

1533-4406

Publication Date

July 19, 2012

Volume

367

Issue

3

Start / End Page

203 / 213

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Watchful Waiting
  • Prostatic Neoplasms
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen
  • Prostate
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Numbers Needed To Treat
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate