Overview of registered studies in orthodontics: Evaluation of the ClinicalTrials.gov registry.

Published

Journal Article

INTRODUCTION: The Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 made it mandatory for all phase II through IV trials regulated by this Act to be registered. After this, the National Institutes of Health created ClinicalTrials.gov, which is a registry of publicly and privately supported clinical studies of human participants. The objective of this study was to examine the characteristics of registered studies in orthodontics. METHODS: The ClinicalTrials.gov Web site was used to query all registered orthodontic studies. The search term used was "orthodontics." No limitations were placed for the time period. All registered studies regardless of their recruitment status, study results, and study type were selected for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 64 orthodontic studies were registered as of January 1, 2014. Of these, 52 were interventional, and 12 were observational. Close to 60% of the interventional studies and 66.7% of the observational studies had sample sizes of 50 or fewer subjects. About 21.2% of the interventional studies and 16.7% of the observational studies had sample sizes greater than 100. Only 1 study was funded by the National Institutes of Health, and the rest were funded by "other" or "industry" sources. Close to 87.7% of the interventional studies were randomized. Interventional model assignments included factorial assignment (3.9%), parallel assignments (74.5%), crossover assignment (7.8%), and single-group assignment (13.7%). Most studies were treatment oriented (80.4%). The types of masking used by the interventional studies included open label (28.9%), single blind (44.2%), and double blind (26.9%). Outcome assessors were blinded in only 6 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontic studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov are dominated by small single-center studies. There are wide variations with regard to treatment allocation approaches and randomization methods in the studies. These results also indicate the need for multicenter clinical studies in orthodontics.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Allareddy, V; Rampa, S; Masoud, MI; Lee, MK; Nalliah, R; Allareddy, V

Published Date

  • November 2014

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 146 / 5

Start / End Page

  • 587 - 593

PubMed ID

  • 25439209

Pubmed Central ID

  • 25439209

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1097-6752

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0889-5406

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.019

Language

  • eng