Skip to main content

Onsite midwife-led birth units (OMBUs) for care around the time of childbirth: A systematic review

Publication ,  Journal Article
Long, Q; Allanson, ER; Pontre, J; Tunçalp, Ö; Hofmeyr, GJ; Gülmezoglu, AM
Published in: BMJ Global Health
January 1, 2016

Introduction: To ensure timely access to comprehensive emergency obstetric care in low- and middle-income countries, a number of interventions have been employed. This systematic review assesses the effects of onsite midwife-led birth units (OMBUs) embedded within hospitals which provide comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care. Methods: Both interventional and observational studies that compared OMBUs with standard medicalled obstetric care were eligible for inclusion. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Science Citation and Social Sciences Citation Index, Global Health Library and one Chinese database were searched. Meta-analysis was conducted to synthesise data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Findings of observational studies were summarised by forest plots with brief narratives. Results: Three RCTs, one controlled before-and-after study and six cohort studies were included. There were no or very few maternal and perinatal deaths in either OMBUs or standard obstetric units, with no significant differences between the two. Women giving birth in OMBUs were less likely to use epidural analgesia (risk ratio (RR) 0.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.82; three trials, n=2431). The UK national cohort study and two other cohorts in China and Nepal found less oxytocin augmentation, more spontaneous vaginal deliveries, fewer caesarean sections and fewer episiotomies performed in OMBUs than in standard obstetric units. These differences were not statistically significant in RCTs and the remaining cohorts. One study investigated satisfaction with midwife-led birth care among women and midwives, with positive findings in both groups favouring OMBUs. In addition, two studies found that the total cost of birth was lower in OMBUs than in standard obstetric units. Conclusions: OMBUs could be an alternative model for providing safe and cost-effective childbirth care, which may be particularly important in low- and middleincome countries to meet the growing demand for facility-based birth for low-risk women and improve efficiency of health systems.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

BMJ Global Health

DOI

EISSN

2059-7908

Publication Date

January 1, 2016

Volume

1

Issue

2

Related Subject Headings

  • 4206 Public health
  • 4203 Health services and systems
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Long, Q., Allanson, E. R., Pontre, J., Tunçalp, Ö., Hofmeyr, G. J., & Gülmezoglu, A. M. (2016). Onsite midwife-led birth units (OMBUs) for care around the time of childbirth: A systematic review. BMJ Global Health, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000096
Long, Q., E. R. Allanson, J. Pontre, Ö. Tunçalp, G. J. Hofmeyr, and A. M. Gülmezoglu. “Onsite midwife-led birth units (OMBUs) for care around the time of childbirth: A systematic review.” BMJ Global Health 1, no. 2 (January 1, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000096.
Long Q, Allanson ER, Pontre J, Tunçalp Ö, Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM. Onsite midwife-led birth units (OMBUs) for care around the time of childbirth: A systematic review. BMJ Global Health. 2016 Jan 1;1(2).
Long, Q., et al. “Onsite midwife-led birth units (OMBUs) for care around the time of childbirth: A systematic review.” BMJ Global Health, vol. 1, no. 2, Jan. 2016. Scopus, doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000096.
Long Q, Allanson ER, Pontre J, Tunçalp Ö, Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM. Onsite midwife-led birth units (OMBUs) for care around the time of childbirth: A systematic review. BMJ Global Health. 2016 Jan 1;1(2).

Published In

BMJ Global Health

DOI

EISSN

2059-7908

Publication Date

January 1, 2016

Volume

1

Issue

2

Related Subject Headings

  • 4206 Public health
  • 4203 Health services and systems