The dilemma of lumping versus splitting evidence: Study design: systematic reviews.
Publication
, Journal Article
Lunyera, J; Diamantidis, CJ
Published in: BJOG
March 2019
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
BJOG
DOI
EISSN
1471-0528
Publication Date
March 2019
Volume
126
Issue
4
Start / End Page
458
Location
England
Related Subject Headings
- Systematic Reviews as Topic
- Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
- Humans
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- 3215 Reproductive medicine
- 11 Medical and Health Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lunyera, J., & Diamantidis, C. J. (2019). The dilemma of lumping versus splitting evidence: Study design: systematic reviews. BJOG, 126(4), 458. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15202
Lunyera, Joseph, and Clarissa J. Diamantidis. “The dilemma of lumping versus splitting evidence: Study design: systematic reviews.” BJOG 126, no. 4 (March 2019): 458. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15202.
Lunyera J, Diamantidis CJ. The dilemma of lumping versus splitting evidence: Study design: systematic reviews. BJOG. 2019 Mar;126(4):458.
Lunyera, Joseph, and Clarissa J. Diamantidis. “The dilemma of lumping versus splitting evidence: Study design: systematic reviews.” BJOG, vol. 126, no. 4, Mar. 2019, p. 458. Pubmed, doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15202.
Lunyera J, Diamantidis CJ. The dilemma of lumping versus splitting evidence: Study design: systematic reviews. BJOG. 2019 Mar;126(4):458.
Published In
BJOG
DOI
EISSN
1471-0528
Publication Date
March 2019
Volume
126
Issue
4
Start / End Page
458
Location
England
Related Subject Headings
- Systematic Reviews as Topic
- Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
- Humans
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- 3215 Reproductive medicine
- 11 Medical and Health Sciences