Quality indicators assessing antibiotic use in the outpatient setting: A systematic review followed by an international multidisciplinary consensus procedure

Published

Journal Article

© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. Objectives: Quality indicators (QIs) assessing the appropriateness of antibiotic use are essential to identify targets for improvement and guide antibiotic stewardship interventions. The aimof this study was to develop a set of QIs for the outpatient setting froma global perspective. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed by searching MEDLINE and relevant web sites in order to retrieve a list of QIs. These indicators were extracted from published trials, guidelines, literature reviews or consensus procedures. This evidence-based set of QIs was evaluated by a multidisciplinary, international group of stakeholders using a RAND-modified Delphi procedure, using two online questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting between them. Stakeholders appraised the QIs' relevance using a nine-point Likert scale. Thiswork is part of the DRIVE-AB project. Results: The systematic literature review identified 43 unique QIs, from 54 studies and seven web sites. Twentyfive stakeholders from14 countries participated in the consensus procedure. Ultimately, 32 QIswere retained,with a high level of agreement. The set of QIs included structure, process and outcome indicators, targeting both highand middle- to low-income settings. Most indicators focused on general practice, addressing the common indications for antibiotic use in the community (particularly urinary and respiratory tract infections), and the organization of healthcare facilities. Twelve indicators specifically addressed outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). Conclusions: We identified a set of 32 outpatient QIs to measure the appropriateness of antibiotic use. These QIs can be used to identify targets for improvement and to evaluate the effects of antibiotic stewardship interventions.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Le Maréchal, M; Tebano, G; Monnier, AA; Adriaenssens, N; Gyssens, IC; Huttner, B; Milanič, R; Schouten, J; Benić, MS; Versporten, A; Vlahović-Palčevski, V; Zanichelli, V; Hulscher, ME; Pulcini, C; Beović, B; Bavestrello, L; Cohen, J; Cortoos, PJ; Dhillon, H; Drew, R; Fernandes, P; Findlay, D; Friedland, I; Gould, I; Hicks, L; Longshaw, C; Llor, C; McGeer, A; Okeke, IN; Plachouras, D; Poulakou, G; Rex, JH; Tängdén, T; Saust, LT; Richon, C; Roblot, F; Stichele, RV; Verweij, M; Wertheim, H

Published Date

  • June 1, 2018

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 73 /

Start / End Page

  • vi40 - vi49

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1460-2091

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0305-7453

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1093/jac/dky117

Citation Source

  • Scopus