Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Cervical Cerclage versus Vaginal Progesterone for Management of Short Cervix in Low-Risk Women.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Wood, AM; Dotters-Katz, SK; Hughes, BL
Published in: Am J Perinatol
January 2019

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of preterm birth in low-risk women with cervical length (CL) ≤25 mm on transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) managed with vaginal progesterone (VagP) therapy versus cerclage. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort of women with no prior history of preterm birth or cervical insufficiency and CL ≤ 25 mm on TVUS, managed with either VagP therapy alone or cerclage (with or without VagP). The primary outcome was rate of preterm delivery < 37 weeks gestational age (GA). Secondary outcomes included delivery at ≤ 32 or ≤ 28 weeks GA, premature preterm rupture of membranes, pregnancy latency, GA at delivery, and composite neonatal outcome. RESULTS: Women undergoing cerclage placement (n = 31) were older and had an earlier GA at the time of diagnosis of short cervix compared with women receiving VagP (n = 62). Delivery at < 37 weeks occurred in 21/62 (33.9%) in the VagP group and 14/31 (45.2%) in the cerclage group (adjusted odds ratio: 1.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.52, 5.66). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Cerclage compared with VagP therapy did not decrease risk of preterm birth in women with CL ≤ 25 mm. Further research is needed to determine optimal management in such women given a residual 40% risk of preterm birth despite optimal therapy.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Am J Perinatol

DOI

EISSN

1098-8785

Publication Date

January 2019

Volume

36

Issue

2

Start / End Page

111 / 117

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Uterine Cervical Incompetence
  • Risk
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Progesterone
  • Premature Birth
  • Pregnancy Outcome
  • Pregnancy
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Wood, A. M., Dotters-Katz, S. K., & Hughes, B. L. (2019). Cervical Cerclage versus Vaginal Progesterone for Management of Short Cervix in Low-Risk Women. Am J Perinatol, 36(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1668547
Wood, Amber M., Sarah K. Dotters-Katz, and Brenna L. Hughes. “Cervical Cerclage versus Vaginal Progesterone for Management of Short Cervix in Low-Risk Women.Am J Perinatol 36, no. 2 (January 2019): 111–17. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1668547.
Wood AM, Dotters-Katz SK, Hughes BL. Cervical Cerclage versus Vaginal Progesterone for Management of Short Cervix in Low-Risk Women. Am J Perinatol. 2019 Jan;36(2):111–7.
Wood, Amber M., et al. “Cervical Cerclage versus Vaginal Progesterone for Management of Short Cervix in Low-Risk Women.Am J Perinatol, vol. 36, no. 2, Jan. 2019, pp. 111–17. Pubmed, doi:10.1055/s-0038-1668547.
Wood AM, Dotters-Katz SK, Hughes BL. Cervical Cerclage versus Vaginal Progesterone for Management of Short Cervix in Low-Risk Women. Am J Perinatol. 2019 Jan;36(2):111–117.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Perinatol

DOI

EISSN

1098-8785

Publication Date

January 2019

Volume

36

Issue

2

Start / End Page

111 / 117

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Uterine Cervical Incompetence
  • Risk
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Progesterone
  • Premature Birth
  • Pregnancy Outcome
  • Pregnancy
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine