Clinical and radiographic parameters that distinguish between the best and worst outcomes of scoliosis surgery for adults.

Published

Journal Article

PURPOSE: Predictors of marked improvement versus failure to improve following surgery for adult scoliosis have not been identified. Our objective was to identify factors that distinguish between patients with the best and worst outcomes following surgery for adult scoliosis. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter spinal deformity database. Inclusion criteria included: age 18-85, scoliosis (Cobb ≥ 30°), and 2-year follow-up. Based on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the SRS-22 at 2-year follow-up, patients with the best and worst outcomes were identified for younger (18-45) and older (46-85) adults with scoliosis. Clinical and radiographic factors were compared between patients with the best and worst outcomes. RESULTS: 276 patients met inclusion criteria (89 younger and 187 older patients). Among younger patients, predictors of poor outcome included: depression/anxiety, smoking, narcotic medication use, older age, greater body mass index (BMI) and greater severity of pain prior to surgery. Among older patients, predictors of poor outcome included: depression/anxiety, narcotic medication use, greater BMI and greater severity of pain prior to surgery. None of the other baseline or peri-operative factors assessed distinguished the best and worst outcomes for younger or older patients, including severity of deformity, operative parameters, or the occurrence of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Not all patients achieve favorable outcomes following surgery for adult scoliosis. Baseline and peri-operative factors distinguishing between patients with the best and worst outcomes were predominantly patient factors, including BMI, depression/anxiety, smoking, and pain severity; not comorbidities, severity of deformity, operative parameters, or complications.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Smith, JS; Shaffrey, CI; Glassman, SD; Carreon, LY; Schwab, FJ; Lafage, V; Arlet, V; Fu, K-MG; Bridwell, KH; Spinal Deformity Study Group,

Published Date

  • February 2013

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 22 / 2

Start / End Page

  • 402 - 410

PubMed ID

  • 23073746

Pubmed Central ID

  • 23073746

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1432-0932

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1007/s00586-012-2547-x

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • Germany