Resection margin and survival in 2368 patients undergoing hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: surgical technique or biologic surrogate?

Published

Conference Paper

OBJECTIVES: The impact of margin width on overall survival (OS) in the context of other prognostic factors after resection for colorectal liver metastases is unclear. We evaluated the relationship between resection margin and OS utilizing high-resolution histologic distance measurements. METHODS: A single-institution prospectively maintained database was queried for all patients who underwent an initial complete resection of colorectal liver metastases between 1992 and 2012. R1 resection was defined as tumor cells at the resection margin (0 mm). R0 resection was further divided into 3 groups: 0.1 to 0.9 mm, 1 to 9 mm, and 10 mm or greater. RESULTS: A total of 4915 liver resections were performed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 1992 and 2012, from which 2368 patients were included in the current study. Half of the patients presented with synchronous disease, 43% had solitary metastasis, and the median tumor size was 3.4 cm. With a median follow-up for survivors of 55 months, the median OS of the R1, 0.1 to 0.9 mm, 1 to 9 mm, and 10 mm or more groups was 32, 40, 53, and 56 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Compared with R1 resection, all margin widths, including submillimeter margins correlated with prolonged OS (P < 0.05). The association between the margin width and OS remained significant when adjusted for all other clinicopathologic prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Resection margin width is independently associated with OS. Wide margins should be attempted whenever possible. However, resection should not be precluded if narrow margins are anticipated, as submillimeter margin clearance is associated with improved survival. The prolonged OS observed with submillimeter margins is likely a microscopic surrogate for the biologic behavior of a tumor rather than the result of surgical technique.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Sadot, E; Groot Koerkamp, B; Leal, JN; Shia, J; Gonen, M; Allen, PJ; DeMatteo, RP; Kingham, TP; Kemeny, N; Blumgart, LH; Jarnagin, WR; D ľAngelica, MI

Published Date

  • September 2015

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 262 / 3

Start / End Page

  • 476 - 485

PubMed ID

  • 26258316

Pubmed Central ID

  • 26258316

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1528-1140

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001427

Conference Location

  • United States