Minimal Impact of Implemented Early Warning Score and Best Practice Alert for Patient Deterioration.

Published

Journal Article

OBJECTIVES:Previous studies have looked at National Early Warning Score performance in predicting in-hospital deterioration and death, but data are lacking with respect to patient outcomes following implementation of National Early Warning Score. We sought to determine the effectiveness of National Early Warning Score implementation on predicting and preventing patient deterioration in a clinical setting. DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING:Tertiary care academic facility and a community hospital. PATIENTS:Patients 18 years old or older hospitalized from March 1, 2014, to February 28, 2015, during preimplementation of National Early Warning Score to August 1, 2015, to July 31, 2016, after National Early Warning Score was implemented. INTERVENTIONS:Implementation of National Early Warning Score within the electronic health record and associated best practice alert. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:In this study of 85,322 patients (42,402 patients pre-National Early Warning Score and 42,920 patients post-National Early Warning Score implementation), the primary outcome of rate of ICU transfer or death did not change after National Early Warning Score implementation, with adjusted hazard ratio of 0.94 (0.84-1.05) and 0.90 (0.77-1.05) at our academic and community hospital, respectively. In total, 175,357 best practice advisories fired during the study period, with the best practice advisory performing better at the community hospital than the academic at predicting an event within 12 hours 7.4% versus 2.2% of the time, respectively. Retraining National Early Warning Score with newly generated hospital-specific coefficients improved model performance. CONCLUSIONS:At both our academic and community hospital, National Early Warning Score had poor performance characteristics and was generally ignored by frontline nursing staff. As a result, National Early Warning Score implementation had no appreciable impact on defined clinical outcomes. Refitting of the model using site-specific data improved performance and supports validating predictive models on local data.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Bedoya, AD; Clement, ME; Phelan, M; Steorts, RC; O'Brien, C; Goldstein, BA

Published Date

  • January 2019

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 47 / 1

Start / End Page

  • 49 - 55

PubMed ID

  • 30247239

Pubmed Central ID

  • 30247239

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1530-0293

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0090-3493

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003439

Language

  • eng