Retrograde ureteral stents for extrinsic ureteral obstruction: nine years' experience at University of Michigan.

Journal Article (Journal Article)

OBJECTIVES: To review our experience with retrograde ureteral stenting for extrinsic ureteral obstruction because previous reports have suggested only moderate success. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the course of patients who underwent retrograde ureteral stent placement from March 1996 to April 2005. The gathered clinical parameters included stent failure, which was defined as any ureteral unit (UU) that remained obstructed. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients treated for extrinsic ureteral compression, representing 87 UUs, were followed for an average of 16 months (range 0.7 to 98) in successful cases. Of the stents, 68% were placed for malignancy, 23% for retroperitoneal fibrosis, and 9% for benign masses. The overall success rate was 84%, with malignancy, retroperitoneal fibrosis, and benign masses having an 81%, an 85%, and a 100% success rate, respectively. Fourteen UUs failed, with a mean time to stent failure of 4.8 months (range 0.07 to 27). Multiple stents were placed in 54 UUs, with a mean of 5.5 stent exchanges, at a mean interval of 3.6 months. On univariate analysis, only greater posttreatment creatinine was associated with stent failure (P <0.01), although stents placed for localized disease tended to be more successful than those placed for regional disease (100% versus 81%, P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: If initial stent placement was possible, extrinsic ureteral obstruction was managed successfully with retrograde ureteral stent placement in 84% of cases. Because no preoperative characteristics could be identified, except for a trend toward less success in cases of regional disease, retrograde stenting can be considered first-line treatment in patients with extrinsic ureteral obstruction.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Rosevear, HM; Kim, SP; Wenzler, DL; Faerber, GJ; Roberts, WW; Wolf, JS

Published Date

  • November 2007

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 70 / 5

Start / End Page

  • 846 - 850

PubMed ID

  • 18068437

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1527-9995

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.008


  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States