Re-envisioning member checking and communicating results as accountability practice in qualitative research: A South African community-based organization example

Published

Journal Article

© 2018, Institut für Qualitative Forschung, Internationale Akademie Berlin gGmbH. All rights reserved. Ethical considerations in communicating results to participants in community-based qualitative research are scrutinized less than in medical or genetics research. We report on ethical issues considered in planning, preparing and returning of study findings to members of a community-based organization who provide care and support services in their community in rural area in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Using returning results as fulcrum, we explore the ethics of member checking and dissemination of findings. We propose revising these activities through ritual criticism aiming for the re-examination of routine ethics systems for the evaluation and improvement of practice. A case example illustrates how returning results comprise accountability practices through methods that are relevant, accessible, meaningful and useful to study participants. Finally, we consider how the dissemination of results to a wider audience might also be performed as accountability practices with deference to participants. Attention to representing results in forms that resonate with participants' frames of reference is called for. The term accountability practices or taking-it-back practices might describe the acts more authentically than current conventions motivating researchers to review current philosophical, ethical and methodological positions on member checking, returning results and dissemination practices.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Naidu, T; Prose, N

Published Date

  • September 1, 2018

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 19 / 3

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 1438-5627

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.17169/fqs-19.3.3153

Citation Source

  • Scopus