Skip to main content

A phase III randomized study comparing perioperative nivolumab vs. observation in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma undergoing nephrectomy (PROSPER RCC).

Publication ,  Conference
Harshman, LC; Puligandla, M; Haas, NB; Allaf, M; Drake, CG; McDermott, DF; Signoretti, S; Cella, D; Gupta, RT; Bhatt, RS; Van Allen, EM ...
Published in: Journal of Clinical Oncology
February 20, 2018

TPS710 Background: The anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab (nivo) improves overall survival (OS) in metastatic treatment refractory RCC and is generally tolerable. In 2017, there is no standard adjuvant therapy proven to increase OS over surgery alone in non-metastatic (M0) disease. Mouse solid tumor models have revealed an OS benefit with a short course of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade compared to adjuvant therapy. Two ongoing phase 2 studies of perioperative nivo in RCC patients (pts) are showing preliminary feasibility and safety with no surgical delays/complications. PROSPER RCC will examine if the addition of perioperative nivo to radical or partial nephrectomy can improve clinical outcomes in pts with locally advanced RCC. We are implementing a three-pronged, multidisciplinary approach of presurgical priming with nivo followed by resection and adjuvant PD-1 blockade with the goal of increasing cure and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates in M0 RCC. Methods: Tumor biopsy prior to randomization is mandatory to ensure RCC diagnosis but will also permit unparalleled correlative science in this global, unblinded, phase 3 National Clinical Trials Network randomized study. 766 pts with clinical stage ≥T2 or any node positive M0 RCC of any histology will be enrolled. The study arm will receive nivo 240mg IV for 2 doses prior to surgery followed by adjuvant dosing for 9 mo (q2 wks x 3 mo followed by q4 wks x 6 mo). The control arm will undergo the current standard of care: surgical resection followed by observation. Pts are stratified by clinical T stage, node positivity, and histology. There is 84.2% power to detect a 14.4% absolute increase in the primary endpoint of RFS from the ASSURE historical control of 55.8% to 70.2% at 5 yrs (HR 0.70). The study is also powered to detect a significant OS benefit (HR 0.67). Safety, feasibility, and quality of life are key secondary endpoints. PROSPER RCC exemplifies team science and incorporates a host of correlative work to examine the significance of the baseline immune milieu and changes induced by neoadjuvant priming and to identify predictive gene expression patterns. New collaborations welcomed. Clinical trial information: NCT03055013.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of Clinical Oncology

DOI

EISSN

1527-7755

ISSN

0732-183X

Publication Date

February 20, 2018

Volume

36

Issue

6_suppl

Start / End Page

TPS710 / TPS710

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Related Subject Headings

  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Harshman, L. C., Puligandla, M., Haas, N. B., Allaf, M., Drake, C. G., McDermott, D. F., … Carducci, M. A. (2018). A phase III randomized study comparing perioperative nivolumab vs. observation in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma undergoing nephrectomy (PROSPER RCC). In Journal of Clinical Oncology (Vol. 36, pp. TPS710–TPS710). American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.tps710
Harshman, Lauren Christine, Maneka Puligandla, Naomi B. Haas, Mohamad Allaf, Charles G. Drake, David F. McDermott, Sabina Signoretti, et al. “A phase III randomized study comparing perioperative nivolumab vs. observation in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma undergoing nephrectomy (PROSPER RCC).” In Journal of Clinical Oncology, 36:TPS710–TPS710. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2018. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.tps710.
Harshman LC, Puligandla M, Haas NB, Allaf M, Drake CG, McDermott DF, et al. A phase III randomized study comparing perioperative nivolumab vs. observation in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma undergoing nephrectomy (PROSPER RCC). In: Journal of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO); 2018. p. TPS710–TPS710.
Harshman, Lauren Christine, et al. “A phase III randomized study comparing perioperative nivolumab vs. observation in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma undergoing nephrectomy (PROSPER RCC).Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 36, no. 6_suppl, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2018, pp. TPS710–TPS710. Crossref, doi:10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.tps710.
Harshman LC, Puligandla M, Haas NB, Allaf M, Drake CG, McDermott DF, Signoretti S, Cella D, Gupta RT, Bhatt RS, Van Allen EM, Choueiri TK, Lara P, Kapoor A, Heng DYC, Shuch BM, Jewett MAS, George DJ, Michaelson MD, Carducci MA. A phase III randomized study comparing perioperative nivolumab vs. observation in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma undergoing nephrectomy (PROSPER RCC). Journal of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO); 2018. p. TPS710–TPS710.

Published In

Journal of Clinical Oncology

DOI

EISSN

1527-7755

ISSN

0732-183X

Publication Date

February 20, 2018

Volume

36

Issue

6_suppl

Start / End Page

TPS710 / TPS710

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Related Subject Headings

  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences