Early Christian re-writing and the history of the pericope adulterae

Published

Journal Article

Texts, even sacred texts, are never fixed. Meaning is never stable and interpretations shift in concert with the changing concerns of those who present them. These principles are readily demonstrated by a consideration of the complex history of the pericope adulterae - a story about Jesus, an adulteress, and a group of interlocutors found in the Gospel of John. This story is absent from many early gospel manuscripts and is remarkably unstable when it does appear. There are a few second- and third-century citations of the tale, but they do not mention the identity or motives of the interlocutors, nor do they specify the guilt (or innocence) of the woman or the men who accused her. By contrast, fourth- and fifth-century exegetes regularly suggested that the interlocutors sought to test Jesus, represented the woman as guilty, and claimed that "the Jews" were damned for their sins, readings that were preserved in gospel manuscripts. The pericope adulterae, increasingly invoked to produce Christian hegemony at the expense of "the Jews," real or imagined, became a story about Jewish sin and Christian difference. This interpretation then influence the transmission of the tale, though traces of earlier readings lingered. © 2006 The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Knust, JW

Published Date

  • January 1, 2006

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 14 / 4

Start / End Page

  • 485 - 536

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1086-3184

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 1067-6341

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1353/earl.2007.0009

Citation Source

  • Scopus