Skip to main content
Journal cover image

A Randomized Trial Comparing Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession versus Unilateral Recess and Resect for Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, ; Writing Committee, ; Donahue, SP; Chandler, DL; Holmes, JM; Arthur, BW; Paysse, EA; Wallace, DK ...
Published in: Ophthalmology
February 2019

PURPOSE: To compare long-term outcomes after bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLRc) or unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with medial rectus resection in the same eye (R&R) for primary treatment of childhood intermittent exotropia (IXT). DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety-seven children 3 to younger than 11 years of age with basic-type IXT, a largest deviation by prism and alternate cover test at any distance of 15 to 40 prism diopters (PD), and near stereoacuity of at least 400 seconds of arc. METHODS: Random assignment to BLRc or R&R and masked examinations conducted every 6 months after surgery for 3 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of participants meeting suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years, defined as: (1) exotropia of 10 PD or more at distance or near using simultaneous prism and cover test (SPCT); or (2) constant esotropia of 6 PD or more at distance or near using SPCT; (3) loss of 2 octaves or more of stereoacuity from baseline, at any masked examination; or (4) reoperation without meeting any of these criteria. RESULTS: Cumulative probability of suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years was 46% (43/101) in the BLRc group versus 37% (33/96) in the R&R group (treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6% to 23%). Reoperation by 3 years occurred in 9 participants (10%) in the BLRc group (8 of 9 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria) and in 4 participants (5%) in the R&R group (3 of 4 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria; treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 5%; 95% CI, -2% to 13%). Among participants completing the 3-year visit, 29% (25 of 86) in the BLRc group and 17% (13 of 77) in the R&R group underwent reoperation or met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria at 3 years (treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 12%; 95% CI, -1% to 25%). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a statistically significant difference in suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years between children with IXT treated with BLRc compared with those treated with R&R. Based on these findings, we are unable to recommend one surgical approach over the other for childhood IXT.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Ophthalmology

DOI

EISSN

1549-4713

Publication Date

February 2019

Volume

126

Issue

2

Start / End Page

305 / 317

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Visual Acuity
  • Vision, Binocular
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures
  • Oculomotor Muscles
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, ., Writing Committee, ., Donahue, S. P., Chandler, D. L., Holmes, J. M., Arthur, B. W., … Miller, A. M. (2019). A Randomized Trial Comparing Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession versus Unilateral Recess and Resect for Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia. Ophthalmology, 126(2), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.034
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, Aaron M., Aaron M. Writing Committee, Sean P. Donahue, Danielle L. Chandler, Jonathan M. Holmes, Brian W. Arthur, Evelyn A. Paysse, et al. “A Randomized Trial Comparing Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession versus Unilateral Recess and Resect for Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia.Ophthalmology 126, no. 2 (February 2019): 305–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.034.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, Writing Committee, Donahue SP, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, Arthur BW, et al. A Randomized Trial Comparing Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession versus Unilateral Recess and Resect for Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):305–17.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, Aaron M., et al. “A Randomized Trial Comparing Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession versus Unilateral Recess and Resect for Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia.Ophthalmology, vol. 126, no. 2, Feb. 2019, pp. 305–17. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.034.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, Writing Committee, Donahue SP, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, Arthur BW, Paysse EA, Wallace DK, Petersen DB, Melia BM, Kraker RT, Miller AM. A Randomized Trial Comparing Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession versus Unilateral Recess and Resect for Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):305–317.
Journal cover image

Published In

Ophthalmology

DOI

EISSN

1549-4713

Publication Date

February 2019

Volume

126

Issue

2

Start / End Page

305 / 317

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Visual Acuity
  • Vision, Binocular
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures
  • Oculomotor Muscles
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Female