Comparing Mammography Abnormality Features to Genetic Variants in the Prediction of Breast Cancer in Women Recommended for Breast Biopsy.
Journal Article (Journal Article)
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The discovery of germline genetic variants associated with breast cancer has engendered interest in risk stratification for improved, targeted detection and diagnosis. However, there has yet to be a comparison of the predictive ability of these genetic variants with mammography abnormality descriptors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study utilized a personalized medicine registry in which participants consented to provide a DNA sample and to participate in longitudinal follow-up. In our retrospective, age-matched, case-controlled study of 373 cases and 395 controls who underwent breast biopsy, we collected risk factors selected a priori based on the literature, including demographic variables based on the Gail model, common germline genetic variants, and diagnostic mammography findings according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). We developed predictive models using logistic regression to determine the predictive ability of (1) demographic variables, (2) 10 selected genetic variants, or (3) mammography BI-RADS features. We evaluated each model in turn by calculating a risk score for each patient using 10-fold cross-validation, used this risk estimate to construct Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (ROC) curves, and compared the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of each using the DeLong method. RESULTS: The performance of the regression model using demographic risk factors was not statistically different from the model using genetic variants (P = 0.9). The model using mammography features (AUC = 0.689) was superior to both the demographic model (AUC = .598; P < 0.001) and the genetic model (AUC = .601; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BI-RADS features exceeded the ability of demographic and 10 selected germline genetic variants to predict breast cancer in women recommended for biopsy.
Full Text
Duke Authors
Cited Authors
- Burnside, ES; Liu, J; Wu, Y; Onitilo, AA; McCarty, CA; Page, CD; Peissig, PL; Trentham-Dietz, A; Kitchner, T; Fan, J; Yuan, M
Published Date
- January 2016
Published In
Volume / Issue
- 23 / 1
Start / End Page
- 62 - 69
PubMed ID
- 26514439
Pubmed Central ID
- PMC4684977
Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)
- 1878-4046
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
- 10.1016/j.acra.2015.09.007
Language
- eng
Conference Location
- United States