Diffusing Capacity of Carbon Monoxide in Assessment of COPD.

Journal Article (Journal Article)

BACKGROUND: Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (Dlco) is inconsistently obtained in patients with COPD, and the added benefit of Dlco testing beyond that of more common tools is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine whether lower Dlco is associated with increased COPD morbidity independent of emphysema assessed via spirometry and CT imaging. METHODS: Data for 1,806 participants with COPD from the Genetic Epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) study 5-year visit were analyzed, including pulmonary function testing, quality of life, symptoms, exercise performance, and exacerbation rates. Dlco percent predicted was primarily analyzed as a continuous variable and additionally categorized into four groups: (1) Dlco and FEV1 > 50% (reference); (2) only Dlco ≤ 50%; (3) only FEV1 ≤ 50%; and (4) both ≤ 50% predicted. Outcomes were modeled by using multivariable linear and negative binomial regression, including emphysema and FEV1 percent predicted among other confounders. RESULTS: In multivariable analyses, every 10% predicted decrease in Dlco was associated with symptoms and quality of life (COPD Assessment Test, 0.53 [P < .001]; St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, 1.67 [P < .001]; Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 Physical Function, -0.89 [P < .001]), exercise performance (6-min walk distance, -45.35 feet; P < .001), and severe exacerbation rate (rate ratio, 1.14; P < .001). When categorized, severe impairment in Dlco alone, FEV1 alone, or both Dlco and FEV1 were associated with significantly worse morbidity compared with the reference group (P < .05 for all outcomes). CONCLUSIONS: Impairment in Dlco was associated with increased COPD symptoms, reduced exercise performance, and severe exacerbation risk even after accounting for spirometry and CT evidence of emphysema. These findings suggest that Dlco should be considered for inclusion in future multidimensional tools assessing COPD.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Balasubramanian, A; MacIntyre, NR; Henderson, RJ; Jensen, RL; Kinney, G; Stringer, WW; Hersh, CP; Bowler, RP; Casaburi, R; Han, MK; Porszasz, J; Barr, RG; Make, BJ; Wise, RA; McCormack, MC

Published Date

  • December 2019

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 156 / 6

Start / End Page

  • 1111 - 1119

PubMed ID

  • 31352035

Pubmed Central ID

  • PMC7242635

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1931-3543

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.chest.2019.06.035


  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States