Peering Into Peer Review: AJR Neuroradiology Reviewers Discuss Their Approaches to Assessing a Manuscript.

Journal Article

OBJECTIVE. This article provides comments from a small group of highly qualified reviewers of the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) regarding their approach to assessing manuscripts. The objective is to educate authors about the issues to which reviewers particularly attend and about errors that will decrease the likelihood of publication. CONCLUSION. By following the advice provided in this article, authors should be able to compose better manuscripts and reviewers should be able to generate better reviews.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Provenzale, JM; Buch, K; Filippi, CG; Gaskill-Shipley, M; Hacein-Bey, L; Soares, BP

Published Date

  • January 2020

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 214 / 1

Start / End Page

  • 45 - 49

PubMed ID

  • 31670589

Pubmed Central ID

  • 31670589

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1546-3141

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.2214/AJR.19.21999

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States