Peering Into Peer Review: AJR Neuroradiology Reviewers Discuss Their Approaches to Assessing a Manuscript.
Publication
, Journal Article
Provenzale, JM; Buch, K; Filippi, CG; Gaskill-Shipley, M; Hacein-Bey, L; Soares, BP
Published in: AJR Am J Roentgenol
January 2020
OBJECTIVE. This article provides comments from a small group of highly qualified reviewers of the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) regarding their approach to assessing manuscripts. The objective is to educate authors about the issues to which reviewers particularly attend and about errors that will decrease the likelihood of publication. CONCLUSION. By following the advice provided in this article, authors should be able to compose better manuscripts and reviewers should be able to generate better reviews.
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
AJR Am J Roentgenol
DOI
EISSN
1546-3141
Publication Date
January 2020
Volume
214
Issue
1
Start / End Page
45 / 49
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- United States
- Radiology
- Publishing
- Periodicals as Topic
- Peer Review, Research
- Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
- Neurology
- Guidelines as Topic
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 1103 Clinical Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Provenzale, J. M., Buch, K., Filippi, C. G., Gaskill-Shipley, M., Hacein-Bey, L., & Soares, B. P. (2020). Peering Into Peer Review: AJR Neuroradiology Reviewers Discuss Their Approaches to Assessing a Manuscript. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 214(1), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.21999
Provenzale, James M., Karen Buch, Christopher G. Filippi, Mary Gaskill-Shipley, Lotfi Hacein-Bey, and Bruno P. Soares. “Peering Into Peer Review: AJR Neuroradiology Reviewers Discuss Their Approaches to Assessing a Manuscript.” AJR Am J Roentgenol 214, no. 1 (January 2020): 45–49. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.21999.
Provenzale JM, Buch K, Filippi CG, Gaskill-Shipley M, Hacein-Bey L, Soares BP. Peering Into Peer Review: AJR Neuroradiology Reviewers Discuss Their Approaches to Assessing a Manuscript. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jan;214(1):45–9.
Provenzale, James M., et al. “Peering Into Peer Review: AJR Neuroradiology Reviewers Discuss Their Approaches to Assessing a Manuscript.” AJR Am J Roentgenol, vol. 214, no. 1, Jan. 2020, pp. 45–49. Pubmed, doi:10.2214/AJR.19.21999.
Provenzale JM, Buch K, Filippi CG, Gaskill-Shipley M, Hacein-Bey L, Soares BP. Peering Into Peer Review: AJR Neuroradiology Reviewers Discuss Their Approaches to Assessing a Manuscript. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jan;214(1):45–49.
Published In
AJR Am J Roentgenol
DOI
EISSN
1546-3141
Publication Date
January 2020
Volume
214
Issue
1
Start / End Page
45 / 49
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- United States
- Radiology
- Publishing
- Periodicals as Topic
- Peer Review, Research
- Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
- Neurology
- Guidelines as Topic
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 1103 Clinical Sciences