Skip to main content

Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Units.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Berg, DD; Bohula, EA; van Diepen, S; Katz, JN; Alviar, CL; Baird-Zars, VM; Barnett, CF; Barsness, GW; Burke, JA; Cremer, PC; Cruz, J; Menon, V ...
Published in: Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
March 2019

Background Clinical investigations of shock in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) have primarily focused on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS). Few studies have evaluated the full spectrum of shock in contemporary CICUs. Methods and Results The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter network of advanced CICUs in North America. Anytime between September 2017 and September 2018, each center (n=16) contributed a 2-month snap-shot of all consecutive medical admissions to the CICU. Data were submitted to the central coordinating center (TIMI Study Group, Boston, MA). Shock was defined as sustained systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg with end-organ dysfunction ascribed to the hypotension. Shock type was classified by site investigators as cardiogenic, distributive, hypovolemic, or mixed. Among 3049 CICU admissions, 677 (22%) met clinical criteria for shock. Shock type was varied, with 66% assessed as cardiogenic shock (CS), 7% as distributive, 3% as hypovolemic, 20% as mixed, and 4% as unknown. Among patients with CS (n=450), 30% had AMICS, 18% had ischemic cardiomyopathy without AMI, 28% had nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and 17% had a cardiac cause other than primary myocardial dysfunction. Patients with mixed shock had cardiovascular comorbidities similar to patients with CS. The median CICU stay was 4.0 days (interquartile range [IQR], 2.5-8.1 days) for AMICS, 4.3 days (IQR, 2.1-8.5 days) for CS not related to AMI, and 5.8 days (IQR, 2.9-10.0 days) for mixed shock versus 1.9 days (IQR, 1.0-3.6) for patients without shock ( P<0.01 for each). Median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were higher in patients with mixed shock (10; IQR, 6-13) versus AMICS (8; IQR, 5-11) or CS without AMI (7; IQR, 5-11; each P<0.01). In-hospital mortality rates were 36% (95% CI, 28%-45%), 31% (95% CI, 26%-36%), and 39% (95% CI, 31%-48%) in AMICS, CS without AMI, and mixed shock, respectively. Conclusions The epidemiology of shock in contemporary advanced CICUs is varied, and AMICS now represents less than one-third of all CS. Despite advanced therapies, mortality in CS and mixed shock remains high. Investigation of management strategies and new therapies to treat shock in the CICU should take this epidemiology into account.

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes

DOI

EISSN

1941-7705

ISSN

1941-7713

Publication Date

March 2019

Volume

12

Issue

3

Start / End Page

e005618

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Shock, Cardiogenic
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Registries
  • Prognosis
  • Organ Dysfunction Scores
  • North America
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Middle Aged
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Berg, D. D., Bohula, E. A., van Diepen, S., Katz, J. N., Alviar, C. L., Baird-Zars, V. M., … Morrow, D. A. (2019). Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Units. Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 12(3), e005618. https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.119.005618
Berg, David D., Erin A. Bohula, Sean van Diepen, Jason N. Katz, Carlos L. Alviar, Vivian M. Baird-Zars, Christopher F. Barnett, et al. “Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Units.Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 12, no. 3 (March 2019): e005618. https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.119.005618.
Berg DD, Bohula EA, van Diepen S, Katz JN, Alviar CL, Baird-Zars VM, et al. Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Units. Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2019 Mar;12(3):e005618.
Berg, David D., et al. “Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Units.Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, vol. 12, no. 3, Mar. 2019, p. e005618. Epmc, doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.119.005618.
Berg DD, Bohula EA, van Diepen S, Katz JN, Alviar CL, Baird-Zars VM, Barnett CF, Barsness GW, Burke JA, Cremer PC, Cruz J, Daniels LB, DeFilippis AP, Haleem A, Hollenberg SM, Horowitz JM, Keller N, Kontos MC, Lawler PR, Menon V, Metkus TS, Ng J, Orgel R, Overgaard CB, Park J-G, Phreaner N, Roswell RO, Schulman SP, Jeffrey Snell R, Solomon MA, Ternus B, Tymchak W, Vikram F, Morrow DA. Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Units. Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2019 Mar;12(3):e005618.

Published In

Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes

DOI

EISSN

1941-7705

ISSN

1941-7713

Publication Date

March 2019

Volume

12

Issue

3

Start / End Page

e005618

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Shock, Cardiogenic
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Registries
  • Prognosis
  • Organ Dysfunction Scores
  • North America
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Middle Aged