Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparison of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Macleod, LC; Fam, MM; Yabes, JG; Hale, NE; Turner, RM; Lopa, SH; Gingrich, JR; Borza, T; Skolarus, TA; Davies, BJ; Jacobs, BL
Published in: Clin Genitourin Cancer
June 2020

BACKGROUND: We use observational methods to compare impact of perioperative chemotherapy timing (ie, neoadjuvant and adjuvant) on overall survival (OS) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer because there is no head-to-head randomized trial, and patient factors may influence decision-making. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data, we identified patients receiving cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2013. Patients were classified as receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity of receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy was determined using gradient boosted models. Inverse probability of treatment weighted survival curves were adjusted for 13 demographic, socioeconomic, temporal, and oncologic covariates. RESULTS: We identified 1342 patients who received neoadjuvant (n = 676) or adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 666) with a median follow-up of 23 months (interquartile range, 9-55 months). Inverse probability of treatment weighted adjustment allows comparison of the groups head-to-head as well as counterfactual scenarios (eg, effect if those getting one treatment were to receive the other). The average treatment effect (ie, "head-to-head" comparison) of adjuvant compared with neoadjuvant on OS was not significant (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.31). However, the average treatment effect of the treated (ie, the effect if the neoadjuvant patients were to receive adjuvant instead) was associated with a 33% increase in risk of mortality if they were given adjuvant therapy instead (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.57). CONCLUSION: Significant treatment selection bias was noted in peri-cystectomy timing, which limits the ability to discriminate differential efficacy of these 2 approaches with observational data. However, patients with higher propensity to receive neoadjuvant therapy were predicted to have increased OS with approach, in keeping with existing paradigms from trial data.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Clin Genitourin Cancer

DOI

EISSN

1938-0682

Publication Date

June 2020

Volume

18

Issue

3

Start / End Page

201 / 209.e2

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
  • United States
  • Survival Rate
  • SEER Program
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Prognosis
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neoplasm Invasiveness
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy
  • Muscle Neoplasms
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Macleod, L. C., Fam, M. M., Yabes, J. G., Hale, N. E., Turner, R. M., Lopa, S. H., … Jacobs, B. L. (2020). Comparison of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer, 18(3), 201-209.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2019.12.011
Macleod, Liam C., Mina M. Fam, Jonathan G. Yabes, Nathan E. Hale, Robert M. Turner, Samia H. Lopa, Jeffrey R. Gingrich, et al. “Comparison of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.Clin Genitourin Cancer 18, no. 3 (June 2020): 201-209.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2019.12.011.
Macleod LC, Fam MM, Yabes JG, Hale NE, Turner RM, Lopa SH, et al. Comparison of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Jun;18(3):201-209.e2.
Macleod, Liam C., et al. “Comparison of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.Clin Genitourin Cancer, vol. 18, no. 3, June 2020, pp. 201-209.e2. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2019.12.011.
Macleod LC, Fam MM, Yabes JG, Hale NE, Turner RM, Lopa SH, Gingrich JR, Borza T, Skolarus TA, Davies BJ, Jacobs BL. Comparison of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Jun;18(3):201-209.e2.
Journal cover image

Published In

Clin Genitourin Cancer

DOI

EISSN

1938-0682

Publication Date

June 2020

Volume

18

Issue

3

Start / End Page

201 / 209.e2

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
  • United States
  • Survival Rate
  • SEER Program
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Prognosis
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neoplasm Invasiveness
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy
  • Muscle Neoplasms