Are Stroke Survivors Discharged to the Recommended Postacute Setting?

Journal Article (Journal Article;Multicenter Study)

OBJECTIVE: To examine the processes and barriers involved in providing postdischarge stroke care. DESIGN: Prospective study of discharge planners' (DP) and physical therapists' (PT) interpretation of factors contributing to patients' discharge destination. SETTING: Twenty-three hospitals in the northeastern United States. PARTICIPANTS: After exclusions, data on patients (N=427) hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of stroke between May 2015 and November 2016 were examined. Of the patients, 45% were women, and the median age was 71 years. DPs and PTs caring for these patients were queried regarding the selection of discharge destination. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of actual discharge destination for stroke patients with the destinations recommended by their DPs and PTs. RESULTS: In total, 184 patients (43.1%) were discharged home, 146 (34.2%) to an inpatient rehabilitation facility, 94 (22.0%) to a skilled nursing facility, and 3 (0.7%) to a long-term acute care hospital. DPs and PTs agreed on the recommended discharge destination in 355 (83.1%) cases. The actual discharge destination matched the DP and PT recommended discharge destination in 92.5% of these cases. In 23 cases (6.5%), the patient was discharged to a less intensive setting than recommended by both respondents. In 4 cases (1.1%), the patient was discharged to a more intensive level of care. In 2 cases (0.6%), the patient was discharged to a long-term acute care hospital rather than an inpatient rehabilitation facility as recommended. Patient or family preference was cited by at least 1 respondent for the discrepancy in discharge destination for 13 patients (3.1%); insurance barriers were cited for 9 patients (2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Most stroke survivors in the northeast United States are discharged to the recommended postacute care destination based on the consensus of DP and PT opinions. Further research is needed to guide postacute care service selection.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Stein, J; Borg-Jensen, P; Sicklick, A; Rodstein, BM; Hedeman, R; Bettger, JP; Hemmitt, R; Silver, BM; Thode, HC; Magdon-Ismail, Z; Northeast Cerebrovascular Consortium,

Published Date

  • July 2020

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 101 / 7

Start / End Page

  • 1190 - 1198

PubMed ID

  • 32272107

Pubmed Central ID

  • 32272107

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1532-821X

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.006

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States