Functional vs Anatomical Testing for Patients With Stable Chest Pain-Binary or Directional Thinking?
Publication
, Journal Article
Douglas, PS
Published in: JAMA Cardiol
August 1, 2020
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
JAMA Cardiol
DOI
EISSN
2380-6591
Publication Date
August 1, 2020
Volume
5
Issue
8
Start / End Page
868 / 870
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Humans
- Coronary Angiography
- Chest Pain
- 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Douglas, P. S. (2020). Functional vs Anatomical Testing for Patients With Stable Chest Pain-Binary or Directional Thinking? JAMA Cardiol, 5(8), 868–870. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1582
Douglas, Pamela S. “Functional vs Anatomical Testing for Patients With Stable Chest Pain-Binary or Directional Thinking?” JAMA Cardiol 5, no. 8 (August 1, 2020): 868–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1582.
Douglas PS. Functional vs Anatomical Testing for Patients With Stable Chest Pain-Binary or Directional Thinking? JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Aug 1;5(8):868–70.
Douglas, Pamela S. “Functional vs Anatomical Testing for Patients With Stable Chest Pain-Binary or Directional Thinking?” JAMA Cardiol, vol. 5, no. 8, Aug. 2020, pp. 868–70. Pubmed, doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1582.
Douglas PS. Functional vs Anatomical Testing for Patients With Stable Chest Pain-Binary or Directional Thinking? JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Aug 1;5(8):868–870.
Published In
JAMA Cardiol
DOI
EISSN
2380-6591
Publication Date
August 1, 2020
Volume
5
Issue
8
Start / End Page
868 / 870
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Humans
- Coronary Angiography
- Chest Pain
- 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology