Graphical models and the challenge of evidence-based practice in development and sustainability

Published

Journal Article

© 2020 Elsevier Ltd Governments and social benefit organizations are expected to consider evidence in decision-making. In development and sustainability, evidence spans disciplines and methodological traditions and is often inconclusive. Graphical models are widely promoted to organize interdisciplinary evidence and improve decision-making by considering mediating variables. However, the reproducibility, objectivity and benefits for decision-making of graphical models have not been studied. We evaluate these considerations in the setting of energy services in the developing world, a contemporary development and sustainability imperative. We develop a database of relevant causal relations (313 concepts, 1337 relationships) asserted in the literature (561 peer-reviewed articles). We demonstrate that high-level relationships of interest to practitioners feature less consistent evidence than the causal relationships that underpin them, supporting increased use of problem decomposition through graphical modeling approaches. However, adding such detail increases complexity exponentially, introducing a hazard of overparameterization if evidence is not available to match the level of mechanistic detail.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Calder, RSD; Alatorre, A; Marx, RS; Mallampalli, V; Mason, SA; Olander, LP; Jeuland, M; Borsuk, ME

Published Date

  • August 1, 2020

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 130 /

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 1364-8152

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104734

Citation Source

  • Scopus