Short- and intermediate-term clinical outcome comparison between laparoscopic and robotic-assisted median arcuate ligament release.

Journal Article (Journal Article)

While laparoscopic median arcuate ligament (MAL) release remains the most common approach, robotic-assisted MAL release has been increasingly performed by several institutions. This study aims to compare surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic-assisted MAL release. This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic-assisted MAL release in a teaching hospital from January 1999 to December 2018. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes as well as short- and intermediate-term clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. A total of 16 laparoscopic and 18 robotic cases were included. Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar between the two comparison groups. Median operative time was shorter in the robotic group [179.5 (IQR 127.3-225) vs. 106 (IQR 80.8-122.8) minutes; p < 0.001]. The rates of conversion to open operation were similar in both groups (6.3% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.99). Conversions to laparotomy were performed due to bleeding and extensive adhesions in one laparoscopic case and due to technical difficulties in a patient with narrow body habitus in the robotic group. Postoperative complication rates were similar (12.5% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.99), all in grade I and II. Complete pain resolution rates (37.5% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.93), symptom recurrence rates (37.5% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.93), and overall clinical improvement at last follow-up (87.5% vs. 77.8%, p = 0.66) were not statistically different. Both laparoscopic and robotic-assisted MAL release offer similar short- and intermediate-term clinical outcomes. A shortened operative time may be achieved by incorporating the robot platform.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Khrucharoen, U; Juo, Y-Y; Chen, Y; Jimenez, JC; Dutson, EP

Published Date

  • February 2020

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 14 / 1

Start / End Page

  • 123 - 129

PubMed ID

  • 30900153

Pubmed Central ID

  • 30900153

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1863-2491

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1007/s11701-019-00945-y

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • England