Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Real-World Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Comparison of Thromboprophylactic Use of Enoxaparin versus Unfractionated Heparin in 376,858 Medically Ill Hospitalized US Patients.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Veeranki, SP; Xiao, Z; Levorsen, A; Sinha, M; Shah, BR
Published in: Am J Cardiovasc Drugs
July 2021

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication in medically ill inpatients. Enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin (UFH) thromboprophylaxis has been shown to reduce VTE in clinical trials; however, comparative effectiveness and differences in hospital costs are unknown in US hospital practice. OBJECTIVE: This study compared clinical and economic outcomes between enoxaparin and UFH thromboprophylaxis in medically ill inpatients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Premier Healthcare Database between 1 January 2010 and 30 September 2016. Inpatients aged ≥ 18 years with a ≥ 6-day hospital stay for serious medical conditions were included. Two patient groups receiving thromboprophylaxis were identified during hospitalization: one receiving enoxaparin and other receiving UFH. Regression models were constructed to compare VTE events, in-hospital mortality, pulmonary embolism (PE)-related mortality, major bleeding, and total hospital costs during both the index hospitalization and the 90-day readmission period between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 242,474 and 134,384 inpatients received enoxaparin or UFH for thromboprophylaxis, respectively. Compared with UFH prophylaxis, enoxaparin was significantly associated with 15%, 9%, 33%, and 41% reduced odds of VTE, in-hospital mortality, PE-related mortality, and major bleeding, respectively, during index hospitalization, and 10% and 19% reduced odds of VTE and bleeding, respectively, during the readmission period. Mean total hospital costs were significantly lower in patients receiving enoxaparin prophylaxis than in those given UFH. CONCLUSIONS: Thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin was associated with significantly reduced in-hospital VTE events, death, and major bleeding and lower hospital costs compared with UFH in hospitalized medically ill patients.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Am J Cardiovasc Drugs

DOI

EISSN

1179-187X

Publication Date

July 2021

Volume

21

Issue

4

Start / End Page

443 / 452

Location

New Zealand

Related Subject Headings

  • Venous Thromboembolism
  • United States
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Sex Factors
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Hospitalization
  • Hospital Mortality
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Veeranki, S. P., Xiao, Z., Levorsen, A., Sinha, M., & Shah, B. R. (2021). Real-World Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Comparison of Thromboprophylactic Use of Enoxaparin versus Unfractionated Heparin in 376,858 Medically Ill Hospitalized US Patients. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs, 21(4), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-020-00456-4
Veeranki, S Phani, Zhimin Xiao, Andrée Levorsen, Meenal Sinha, and Bimal R. Shah. “Real-World Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Comparison of Thromboprophylactic Use of Enoxaparin versus Unfractionated Heparin in 376,858 Medically Ill Hospitalized US Patients.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 21, no. 4 (July 2021): 443–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-020-00456-4.
Veeranki, S. Phani, et al. “Real-World Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Comparison of Thromboprophylactic Use of Enoxaparin versus Unfractionated Heparin in 376,858 Medically Ill Hospitalized US Patients.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs, vol. 21, no. 4, July 2021, pp. 443–52. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s40256-020-00456-4.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Cardiovasc Drugs

DOI

EISSN

1179-187X

Publication Date

July 2021

Volume

21

Issue

4

Start / End Page

443 / 452

Location

New Zealand

Related Subject Headings

  • Venous Thromboembolism
  • United States
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Sex Factors
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Hospitalization
  • Hospital Mortality