Wearables in the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: What Are They Good for?

Journal Article (Journal Article)

Recently, companies such as Apple Inc, Fitbit Inc, and Garmin Ltd have released new wearable blood oxygenation measurement technologies. Although the release of these technologies has great potential for generating health-related information, it is important to acknowledge the repercussions of consumer-targeted biometric monitoring technologies (BioMeTs), which in practice, are often used for medical decision making. BioMeTs are bodily connected digital medicine products that process data captured by mobile sensors that use algorithms to generate measures of behavioral and physiological function. These BioMeTs span both general wellness products and medical devices, and consumer-targeted BioMeTs intended for general wellness purposes are not required to undergo a standardized and transparent evaluation process for ensuring their quality and accuracy. The combination of product functionality, marketing, and the circumstances of the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have inevitably led to the use of consumer-targeted BioMeTs for reporting health-related measurements to drive medical decision making. In this viewpoint, we urge consumer-targeted BioMeT manufacturers to go beyond the bare minimum requirements described in US Food and Drug Administration guidance when releasing information on wellness BioMeTs. We also explore new methods and incentive systems that may result in a clearer public understanding of the performance and intended use of consumer-targeted BioMeTs.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Bent, B; Dunn, JP

Published Date

  • December 22, 2020

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 8 / 12

Start / End Page

  • e25137 -

PubMed ID

  • 33315580

Pubmed Central ID

  • PMC7758082

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 2291-5222

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 2291-5222

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.2196/25137


  • eng