Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or why are there so few/many species?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Butlin, RK; Servedio, MR; Smadja, CM; Bank, C; Barton, NH; Flaxman, SM; Giraud, T; Hopkins, R; Larson, EL; Maan, ME; Meier, J; Merrill, R ...
Published in: Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
May 2021

If there are no constraints on the process of speciation, then the number of species might be expected to match the number of available niches and this number might be indefinitely large. One possible constraint is the opportunity for allopatric divergence. In 1981, Felsenstein used a simple and elegant model to ask if there might also be genetic constraints. He showed that progress towards speciation could be described by the build-up of linkage disequilibrium among divergently selected loci and between these loci and those contributing to other forms of reproductive isolation. Therefore, speciation is opposed by recombination, because it tends to break down linkage disequilibria. Felsenstein then introduced a crucial distinction between "two-allele" models, which are subject to this effect, and "one-allele" models, which are free from the recombination constraint. These fundamentally important insights have been the foundation for both empirical and theoretical studies of speciation ever since.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution

DOI

EISSN

1558-5646

ISSN

0014-3820

Publication Date

May 2021

Volume

75

Issue

5

Start / End Page

978 / 988

Related Subject Headings

  • Reproductive Isolation
  • Recombination, Genetic
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Linkage Disequilibrium
  • Genetic Speciation
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Biological Evolution
  • Animals
  • 3104 Evolutionary biology
  • 3103 Ecology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Butlin, R. K., Servedio, M. R., Smadja, C. M., Bank, C., Barton, N. H., Flaxman, S. M., … Qvarnström, A. (2021). Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or why are there so few/many species? Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, 75(5), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14235
Butlin, Roger K., Maria R. Servedio, Carole M. Smadja, Claudia Bank, Nicholas H. Barton, Samuel M. Flaxman, Tatiana Giraud, et al. “Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or why are there so few/many species?Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 75, no. 5 (May 2021): 978–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14235.
Butlin RK, Servedio MR, Smadja CM, Bank C, Barton NH, Flaxman SM, et al. Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or why are there so few/many species? Evolution; international journal of organic evolution. 2021 May;75(5):978–88.
Butlin, Roger K., et al. “Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or why are there so few/many species?Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, vol. 75, no. 5, May 2021, pp. 978–88. Epmc, doi:10.1111/evo.14235.
Butlin RK, Servedio MR, Smadja CM, Bank C, Barton NH, Flaxman SM, Giraud T, Hopkins R, Larson EL, Maan ME, Meier J, Merrill R, Noor MAF, Ortiz-Barrientos D, Qvarnström A. Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or why are there so few/many species? Evolution; international journal of organic evolution. 2021 May;75(5):978–988.
Journal cover image

Published In

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution

DOI

EISSN

1558-5646

ISSN

0014-3820

Publication Date

May 2021

Volume

75

Issue

5

Start / End Page

978 / 988

Related Subject Headings

  • Reproductive Isolation
  • Recombination, Genetic
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Linkage Disequilibrium
  • Genetic Speciation
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Biological Evolution
  • Animals
  • 3104 Evolutionary biology
  • 3103 Ecology