Skip to main content

Omidubicel vs standard myeloablative umbilical cord blood transplantation: results of a phase 3 randomized study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Horwitz, ME; Stiff, PJ; Cutler, C; Brunstein, C; Hanna, R; Maziarz, RT; Rezvani, AR; Karris, NA; McGuirk, J; Valcarcel, D; Schiller, GJ ...
Published in: Blood
October 21, 2021

Omidubicel is an ex vivo expanded hematopoietic progenitor cell and nonexpanded myeloid and lymphoid cell product derived from a single umbilical cord blood unit. We report results of a phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy of omidubicel compared with standard umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT). Between January 2017 and January 2020, 125 patients age 13 to 65 years with hematologic malignancies were randomly assigned to omidubicel vs standard UCBT. Patients received myeloablative conditioning and prophylaxis with a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The primary end point was time to neutrophil engraftment. The treatment arms were well balanced and racially diverse. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 12 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 10-14 days) for the omidubicel arm and 22 days (95% CI, 19-25 days) for the control arm (P < .001). The cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment was 96% for patients receiving omidubicel and 89% for patients receiving control transplants. The omidubicel arm had faster platelet recovery (55% vs 35% recovery by 42 days; P = .028), had a lower incidence of first grade 2 to 3 bacterial or invasive fungal infection (37% vs 57%; P = .027), and spent more time out of hospital during the first 100 days after transplant (median, 61 vs 48 days; P = .005) than controls. Differences in GVHD and survival between the 2 arms were not statistically significant. Transplantation with omidubicel results in faster hematopoietic recovery and reduces early transplant-related complications compared with standard UCBT. The results suggest that omidubicel may be considered as a new standard of care for adult patients eligible for UCBT. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02730299.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Blood

DOI

EISSN

1528-0020

Publication Date

October 21, 2021

Volume

138

Issue

16

Start / End Page

1429 / 1440

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Immunology
  • Humans
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Hematopoiesis
  • Hematologic Neoplasms
  • Graft vs Host Disease
  • Graft Survival
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Horwitz, M. E., Stiff, P. J., Cutler, C., Brunstein, C., Hanna, R., Maziarz, R. T., … Sanz, G. (2021). Omidubicel vs standard myeloablative umbilical cord blood transplantation: results of a phase 3 randomized study. Blood, 138(16), 1429–1440. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2021011719
Horwitz, Mitchell E., Patrick J. Stiff, Corey Cutler, Claudio Brunstein, Rabi Hanna, Richard T. Maziarz, Andrew R. Rezvani, et al. “Omidubicel vs standard myeloablative umbilical cord blood transplantation: results of a phase 3 randomized study.Blood 138, no. 16 (October 21, 2021): 1429–40. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2021011719.
Horwitz ME, Stiff PJ, Cutler C, Brunstein C, Hanna R, Maziarz RT, et al. Omidubicel vs standard myeloablative umbilical cord blood transplantation: results of a phase 3 randomized study. Blood. 2021 Oct 21;138(16):1429–40.
Horwitz, Mitchell E., et al. “Omidubicel vs standard myeloablative umbilical cord blood transplantation: results of a phase 3 randomized study.Blood, vol. 138, no. 16, Oct. 2021, pp. 1429–40. Pubmed, doi:10.1182/blood.2021011719.
Horwitz ME, Stiff PJ, Cutler C, Brunstein C, Hanna R, Maziarz RT, Rezvani AR, Karris NA, McGuirk J, Valcarcel D, Schiller GJ, Lindemans CA, Hwang WYK, Koh LP, Keating A, Khaled Y, Hamerschlak N, Frankfurt O, Peled T, Segalovich I, Blackwell B, Wease S, Freedman LS, Galamidi-Cohen E, Sanz G. Omidubicel vs standard myeloablative umbilical cord blood transplantation: results of a phase 3 randomized study. Blood. 2021 Oct 21;138(16):1429–1440.

Published In

Blood

DOI

EISSN

1528-0020

Publication Date

October 21, 2021

Volume

138

Issue

16

Start / End Page

1429 / 1440

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Immunology
  • Humans
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Hematopoiesis
  • Hematologic Neoplasms
  • Graft vs Host Disease
  • Graft Survival