Skip to main content

Clinical Indications and Impact on Management: Fourth and Subsequent Posttherapy Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans in Oncology Patients.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Taghipour, M; Marcus, C; Sheikhbahaei, S; Mena, E; Prasad, S; Jha, AK; Solnes, L; Subramaniam, RM
Published in: J Nucl Med
May 2017

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services coverage includes 3 posttherapy 18F-FDG PET/CT scans per patient and per tumor type. Any additional follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT scans will be reimbursed at the discretion of a local Medicare administrator, if deemed medically necessary. This study aimed to investigate common clinical indications for performing a fourth or additional follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT scans that could affect the management of patients. Methods: This was a retrospective institutional review of 433 oncology patients (203 men; mean age, 55 y), including a total of 1,659 fourth or subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans after completion of primary treatment. Twelve indications for performing a fourth or subsequent follow-up PET/CT scan were determined, and the impact of each of the 12 indications on patients' management was evaluated. Results: The primary tumors were breast cancer (92 patients, 426 scans), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (77 patients, 208 scans), Hodgkin disease (41 patients, 182 scans), colorectal cancer (70 patients, 286 scans), melanoma (69 patients, 271 scans), and lung cancer (84 patients, 286 scans). The indications were categorized in 4 groups: PET/CT for diagnosis of tumor recurrence (303/1,659, 18.3%), PET/CT before starting therapy for tumor recurrence (64/1,659, 3.9%), PET/CT to assess therapy response for tumor recurrence (507/1,659, 30.6%), and follow-up PET/CT after completion of treatment for tumor recurrence (785/1,659, 47.3%). Overall, fourth and subsequent follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT scans resulted in change in management in 31.6% of the scans (356 of 1,128) when the scans were obtained for medical necessities (indications 1-11), and in 5.6% of the scans (30/531) when the scans were obtained without any medical necessity (indication 12). Conclusion: The fourth and subsequent PET/CT scans obtained after completion of primary treatment led to a change in management in 31.6% of the scans when acquired for appropriate clinical reasons. Performing follow-up PET/CT without appropriate medical reason had a low impact on patients' management and should be avoided.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Nucl Med

DOI

EISSN

1535-5667

Publication Date

May 2017

Volume

58

Issue

5

Start / End Page

737 / 743

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Unnecessary Procedures
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Texas
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
  • Patient Care Management
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Taghipour, M., Marcus, C., Sheikhbahaei, S., Mena, E., Prasad, S., Jha, A. K., … Subramaniam, R. M. (2017). Clinical Indications and Impact on Management: Fourth and Subsequent Posttherapy Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans in Oncology Patients. J Nucl Med, 58(5), 737–743. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.183111
Taghipour, Mehdi, Charles Marcus, Sara Sheikhbahaei, Esther Mena, Shwetha Prasad, Abhinav K. Jha, Lilja Solnes, and Rathan M. Subramaniam. “Clinical Indications and Impact on Management: Fourth and Subsequent Posttherapy Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans in Oncology Patients.J Nucl Med 58, no. 5 (May 2017): 737–43. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.183111.
Taghipour M, Marcus C, Sheikhbahaei S, Mena E, Prasad S, Jha AK, et al. Clinical Indications and Impact on Management: Fourth and Subsequent Posttherapy Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans in Oncology Patients. J Nucl Med. 2017 May;58(5):737–43.
Taghipour, Mehdi, et al. “Clinical Indications and Impact on Management: Fourth and Subsequent Posttherapy Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans in Oncology Patients.J Nucl Med, vol. 58, no. 5, May 2017, pp. 737–43. Pubmed, doi:10.2967/jnumed.116.183111.
Taghipour M, Marcus C, Sheikhbahaei S, Mena E, Prasad S, Jha AK, Solnes L, Subramaniam RM. Clinical Indications and Impact on Management: Fourth and Subsequent Posttherapy Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans in Oncology Patients. J Nucl Med. 2017 May;58(5):737–743.

Published In

J Nucl Med

DOI

EISSN

1535-5667

Publication Date

May 2017

Volume

58

Issue

5

Start / End Page

737 / 743

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Unnecessary Procedures
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Texas
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
  • Patient Care Management
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care