Skip to main content

Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT: interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Viner, M; Mercier, G; Hao, F; Malladi, A; Subramaniam, RM
Published in: Radiology
May 2013

PURPOSE: To evaluate how interreader agreement and the site of the volume of interest (VOI) affect the agreement and variability of liver mean standardized uptake value normalized to lean body mass (SUL(mean)) at fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective review of PET/CT images and patient records. PET/CT images were reviewed in 116 randomly selected patients who had undergone a baseline PET/CT examination and who had normal livers according to imaging and biochemical test results. A 30-mm-diameter spherical VOI was placed within the right lobe of the liver above, below, and at the level of the main portal vein. Two readers performed all measurements independently. Analysis of variance, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis, and Bland-Altman analysis were performed. RESULTS: The mean SUL(mean) was between 2.11 and 2.17 at the upper, portal, and lower levels of the right lobe of the liver. The coefficient of variance was between 21.0% and 23.1%, without significant differences for location, with the least variance in the upper level. The ICC of the two readers varied between 0.98 and 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97, 0.99; P = .0001) at each level. The greatest precision (narrowest CI) was also in the upper level. Bias was 0.025 ± 0.10 (standard deviation) at the upper level, was 0.004 ± 0.14 at the lower level, and was 0.047 ± 0.10 at the portal vein (P = .02). For each reader, there was almost perfect reliability between the SUL(mean) measurements made at the three levels, with an ICC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.98, 0.99; P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Liver SUL(mean) at FDG PET/CT has excellent interreader agreement, with similar values and variance whether measured at the upper, lower, or portal vein levels within the right lobe of the liver.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Radiology

DOI

EISSN

1527-1315

Publication Date

May 2013

Volume

267

Issue

2

Start / End Page

596 / 601

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Reference Values
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Multimodal Imaging
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Viner, M., Mercier, G., Hao, F., Malladi, A., & Subramaniam, R. M. (2013). Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT: interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest. Radiology, 267(2), 596–601. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12121385
Viner, Maya, Gustavo Mercier, Frank Hao, Ashish Malladi, and Rathan M. Subramaniam. “Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT: interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest.Radiology 267, no. 2 (May 2013): 596–601. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12121385.
Viner M, Mercier G, Hao F, Malladi A, Subramaniam RM. Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT: interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest. Radiology. 2013 May;267(2):596–601.
Viner, Maya, et al. “Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT: interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest.Radiology, vol. 267, no. 2, May 2013, pp. 596–601. Pubmed, doi:10.1148/radiol.12121385.
Viner M, Mercier G, Hao F, Malladi A, Subramaniam RM. Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT: interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest. Radiology. 2013 May;267(2):596–601.

Published In

Radiology

DOI

EISSN

1527-1315

Publication Date

May 2013

Volume

267

Issue

2

Start / End Page

596 / 601

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Reference Values
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Multimodal Imaging
  • Middle Aged
  • Male