Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Intra-reader reliability of FDG PET volumetric tumor parameters: effects of primary tumor size and segmentation methods.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Shah, B; Srivastava, N; Hirsch, AE; Mercier, G; Subramaniam, RM
Published in: Ann Nucl Med
November 2012

OBJECTIVE: To establish the effects of size and segmentation methods on intra-reader reliability of primary tumor metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total glycolytic activity (TGA) in human solid tumors. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 121 patients who had a baseline FDG PET/CT scan for oncologic staging. Volumetric parameter readings were performed in random order on two separate occasions, 12 weeks apart, by the same reader. The MTV and TGA were segmented using gradient and fixed maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) threshold methods. Intra-reader reliability was established by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The biases for MTV were 2.95, 14.76 and 11.13% for gradient segmentation, 38 and 50% SUVmax fixed threshold segmentations, respectively (p < 0.0001). For TGA, the corresponding biases were 0.76, 10.36 and 7.46% (p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in the biases between the first and second reads for MTV segmented for small and large volume tumors by the gradient method (p < 0.34) or 50% SUVmax threshold segmentation (p < 0.08). However, there were statistically significant differences in the corresponding biases for the 38% SUVmax threshold segmentation (p < 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in the biases between the first and second reads for TGA segmented for small and large volume tumors (p < 0.98). CONCLUSION: Intra-reader reliability for primary tumor FDG MTV and TGA is affected by the tumor size and segmentation methods. The segmentation bias was smaller for gradient method than percentage fixed threshold method for MTV. The segmentation biases were smaller for TGA than MTV.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Ann Nucl Med

DOI

EISSN

1864-6433

Publication Date

November 2012

Volume

26

Issue

9

Start / End Page

707 / 714

Location

Japan

Related Subject Headings

  • Tumor Burden
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Observer Variation
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Neoplasms
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Shah, B., Srivastava, N., Hirsch, A. E., Mercier, G., & Subramaniam, R. M. (2012). Intra-reader reliability of FDG PET volumetric tumor parameters: effects of primary tumor size and segmentation methods. Ann Nucl Med, 26(9), 707–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-012-0630-3
Shah, B., N. Srivastava, A. E. Hirsch, G. Mercier, and R. M. Subramaniam. “Intra-reader reliability of FDG PET volumetric tumor parameters: effects of primary tumor size and segmentation methods.Ann Nucl Med 26, no. 9 (November 2012): 707–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-012-0630-3.
Shah B, Srivastava N, Hirsch AE, Mercier G, Subramaniam RM. Intra-reader reliability of FDG PET volumetric tumor parameters: effects of primary tumor size and segmentation methods. Ann Nucl Med. 2012 Nov;26(9):707–14.
Shah, B., et al. “Intra-reader reliability of FDG PET volumetric tumor parameters: effects of primary tumor size and segmentation methods.Ann Nucl Med, vol. 26, no. 9, Nov. 2012, pp. 707–14. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s12149-012-0630-3.
Shah B, Srivastava N, Hirsch AE, Mercier G, Subramaniam RM. Intra-reader reliability of FDG PET volumetric tumor parameters: effects of primary tumor size and segmentation methods. Ann Nucl Med. 2012 Nov;26(9):707–714.
Journal cover image

Published In

Ann Nucl Med

DOI

EISSN

1864-6433

Publication Date

November 2012

Volume

26

Issue

9

Start / End Page

707 / 714

Location

Japan

Related Subject Headings

  • Tumor Burden
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Observer Variation
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Neoplasms
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted