Skip to main content

Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu

Publication ,  Journal Article
Cutchin, MP; Aldrich, RM; Bailliard, AL; Coppola, S
Published in: Journal of Occupational Science
January 1, 2008

Occupational scientists have argued that occupation implies action, but they have not produced sufficient analyses of action theories as potential bases for understanding occupation. We describe this situation and the corresponding need to theorize action as a necessary step for more carefully and powerfully conceptualizing occupation. To begin addressing the problem and need, we provide an analysis of two theorists, John Dewey and Pierre Bourdieu, whose writings about action may be applied to deepen understandings of occupation. Our analysis focuses on three dimensions of action common to both scholars’ theories—habit, context, and creativity. In comparing and contrasting the theories, we find them largely in agreement but also complementary. Through a discussion of the theories via these dimensions, we extend and deepen the transactional view of occupation. In addition, we offer a conceptualization of occupation consistent with the two theorists’ works. © 2008 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Journal of Occupational Science

DOI

EISSN

2158-1576

ISSN

1442-7591

Publication Date

January 1, 2008

Volume

15

Issue

3

Start / End Page

157 / 165

Related Subject Headings

  • Rehabilitation
  • 3505 Human resources and industrial relations
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Cutchin, M. P., Aldrich, R. M., Bailliard, A. L., & Coppola, S. (2008). Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2008.9686625
Cutchin, M. P., R. M. Aldrich, A. L. Bailliard, and S. Coppola. “Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu.” Journal of Occupational Science 15, no. 3 (January 1, 2008): 157–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2008.9686625.
Cutchin MP, Aldrich RM, Bailliard AL, Coppola S. Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu. Journal of Occupational Science. 2008 Jan 1;15(3):157–65.
Cutchin, M. P., et al. “Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu.” Journal of Occupational Science, vol. 15, no. 3, Jan. 2008, pp. 157–65. Scopus, doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686625.
Cutchin MP, Aldrich RM, Bailliard AL, Coppola S. Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu. Journal of Occupational Science. 2008 Jan 1;15(3):157–165.

Published In

Journal of Occupational Science

DOI

EISSN

2158-1576

ISSN

1442-7591

Publication Date

January 1, 2008

Volume

15

Issue

3

Start / End Page

157 / 165

Related Subject Headings

  • Rehabilitation
  • 3505 Human resources and industrial relations
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences