Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Influence of editing pulse flip angle on J-difference MR spectroscopy.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Tapper, S; Hui, SCN; Saleh, MG; Zöllner, HJ; Oeltzschner, G; Near, J; Soher, BJ; Edden, RAE
Published in: Magn Reson Med
February 2022

PURPOSE: To investigate the editing-pulse flip angle (FA) dependence of editing efficiency and ultimately to maximize the edited signal of commonly edited MR spectroscopy (MRS) signals, such as gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and lactate. METHODS: Density-matrix simulations were performed for a range of spin systems to find the editing-pulse FA for maximal editing efficiency. Simulations were confirmed by phantom experiments and in vivo measurements in 10 healthy participants using a 3T Philips scanner. Four MEGA-PRESS in vivo measurements targeting GABA+ and lactate were performed, comparing the conventional editing-pulse FA (FA = 180°) to the optimal one suggested by simulations (FA = 210°). RESULTS: Simulations and phantom experiments show that edited GABA and lactate signals are maximal at FA = 210°. Compared to conventional editing (FA = 180°), in vivo signals from GABA+ and lactate signals increase on average by 8.5% and 9.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Increasing the FA of editing-pulses in the MEGA-PRESS experiment from 180° to 210° increases the edited signals from GABA+ and lactate by about 9% in vivo.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Magn Reson Med

DOI

EISSN

1522-2594

Publication Date

February 2022

Volume

87

Issue

2

Start / End Page

589 / 596

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
  • Lactic Acid
  • Humans
  • Healthy Volunteers
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Tapper, S., Hui, S. C. N., Saleh, M. G., Zöllner, H. J., Oeltzschner, G., Near, J., … Edden, R. A. E. (2022). Influence of editing pulse flip angle on J-difference MR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med, 87(2), 589–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29008
Tapper, Sofie, Steve C. N. Hui, Muhammad G. Saleh, Helge J. Zöllner, Georg Oeltzschner, Jamie Near, Brian J. Soher, and Richard A. E. Edden. “Influence of editing pulse flip angle on J-difference MR spectroscopy.Magn Reson Med 87, no. 2 (February 2022): 589–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29008.
Tapper S, Hui SCN, Saleh MG, Zöllner HJ, Oeltzschner G, Near J, et al. Influence of editing pulse flip angle on J-difference MR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 2022 Feb;87(2):589–96.
Tapper, Sofie, et al. “Influence of editing pulse flip angle on J-difference MR spectroscopy.Magn Reson Med, vol. 87, no. 2, Feb. 2022, pp. 589–96. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/mrm.29008.
Tapper S, Hui SCN, Saleh MG, Zöllner HJ, Oeltzschner G, Near J, Soher BJ, Edden RAE. Influence of editing pulse flip angle on J-difference MR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 2022 Feb;87(2):589–596.
Journal cover image

Published In

Magn Reson Med

DOI

EISSN

1522-2594

Publication Date

February 2022

Volume

87

Issue

2

Start / End Page

589 / 596

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
  • Lactic Acid
  • Humans
  • Healthy Volunteers
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering