Skip to main content

Reliability of Oronasal Fistula Classification: Methodological Issue.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Sabour, S
Published in: Cleft Palate Craniofac J
March 2018

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Cleft Palate Craniofac J

DOI

EISSN

1545-1569

Publication Date

March 2018

Volume

55

Issue

3

Start / End Page

470

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Oral Fistula
  • Nose Diseases
  • Humans
  • Dentistry
  • 3203 Dentistry
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1105 Dentistry
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sabour, S. (2018). Reliability of Oronasal Fistula Classification: Methodological Issue. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 55(3), 470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665617739314
Sabour, Siamak. “Reliability of Oronasal Fistula Classification: Methodological Issue.Cleft Palate Craniofac J 55, no. 3 (March 2018): 470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665617739314.
Sabour S. Reliability of Oronasal Fistula Classification: Methodological Issue. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Mar;55(3):470.
Sabour, Siamak. “Reliability of Oronasal Fistula Classification: Methodological Issue.Cleft Palate Craniofac J, vol. 55, no. 3, Mar. 2018, p. 470. Pubmed, doi:10.1177/1055665617739314.
Sabour S. Reliability of Oronasal Fistula Classification: Methodological Issue. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Mar;55(3):470.

Published In

Cleft Palate Craniofac J

DOI

EISSN

1545-1569

Publication Date

March 2018

Volume

55

Issue

3

Start / End Page

470

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Oral Fistula
  • Nose Diseases
  • Humans
  • Dentistry
  • 3203 Dentistry
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1105 Dentistry