Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Hybrid Transtibial Femoral Preparation for Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Radiographic Comparison With the Transtibial and Anteromedial Portal Techniques.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Jarvis, DL; Vance, DD; Reinke, EK; Riboh, JC
Published in: Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
November 2021

Transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains the most commonly used technique for pubescent patients. The transtibial (TT) drilling technique creates vertical and central femoral tunnels to minimize the physeal area of injury at the expense of a nonanatomic femoral tunnel. The hybrid TT (HTT) technique offers the potential of an anatomic femoral position with tunnel geometry similar to that using the TT technique.The purpose was to perform a radiographic comparison of the HTT technique with TT and anteromedial portal (AM) techniques in adolescent patients undergoing transphyseal ACL reconstruction. It was hypothesized that femoral tunnels created during HTT would be similar to TT tunnels but significantly more vertical and central than AM tunnels.Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.We retrospectively screened primary transphyseal ACL reconstructions performed in adolescents at our institution between 2013 and 2019. The youngest 20 eligible patients were selected from each technique cohort: TT, AM, and HTT. Postoperative radiographs were assessed for the coronal femoral tunnel angle, as well as the location of the tunnel-physis penetration on the anteroposterior and lateral views. Physeal lesion surface area was calculated. Data were compared among the 3 groups using 1-way analysis of variance followed by pairwise comparisons.Included were 47 patients with a mean ± SD age of 14.3 ± 1.2 years (n = 9 with TT, 18 with AM, and 20 with HTT techniques). The coronal tunnel angle was significantly more vertical in the TT (60.7° ± 7.2°) and HTT (54.4° ± 5.7) groups as compared with the AM group (48.8° ± 5.9; P = .0037 and P = .02, respectively). There was no significant difference between the TT and HTT groups (P = .066). The only significant finding regarding femoral tunnel location was that the HTT tunnels (28.9% ± 4.8%) penetrated the physis more centrally than did the AM tunnels (20.0% ± 5.1%; P = .00002) on lateral radiographs.The HTT technique presents an option for transphyseal ACL reconstruction, with femoral tunnel obliquity and estimated physeal disruption similar to that of the TT technique and significantly less than that of the AM technique. The HTT technique also results in the most central physeal perforation of all techniques, predominantly in the sagittal plane.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine

DOI

EISSN

2325-9671

ISSN

2325-9671

Publication Date

November 2021

Volume

9

Issue

11

Start / End Page

23259671211054509

Related Subject Headings

  • 4207 Sports science and exercise
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Jarvis, D. L., Vance, D. D., Reinke, E. K., & Riboh, J. C. (2021). Hybrid Transtibial Femoral Preparation for Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Radiographic Comparison With the Transtibial and Anteromedial Portal Techniques. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 9(11), 23259671211054508. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211054509
Jarvis, D Landry, Danica D. Vance, Emily K. Reinke, and Jonathan C. Riboh. “Hybrid Transtibial Femoral Preparation for Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Radiographic Comparison With the Transtibial and Anteromedial Portal Techniques.Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 9, no. 11 (November 2021): 23259671211054508. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211054509.
Jarvis, D. Landry, et al. “Hybrid Transtibial Femoral Preparation for Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Radiographic Comparison With the Transtibial and Anteromedial Portal Techniques.Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 9, no. 11, Nov. 2021, p. 23259671211054508. Epmc, doi:10.1177/23259671211054509.
Journal cover image

Published In

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine

DOI

EISSN

2325-9671

ISSN

2325-9671

Publication Date

November 2021

Volume

9

Issue

11

Start / End Page

23259671211054509

Related Subject Headings

  • 4207 Sports science and exercise
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences