Skip to main content

Accuracy of detecting enlargement of aneurysms using different MRI modalities and measurement protocols.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Nakagawa, D; Nagahama, Y; Policeni, BA; Raghavan, ML; Dillard, SI; Schumacher, AL; Sarathy, S; Dlouhy, BJ; Wilson, S; Allan, L; Woo, HH ...
Published in: J Neurosurg
March 9, 2018

OBJECTIVE: Aneurysm growth is considered predictive of future rupture of intracranial aneurysms. However, how accurately neuroradiologists can reliably detect incremental aneurysm growth using clinical MRI is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement rate of detecting aneurysm enlargement employing generally used MRI modalities. METHODS: Three silicone flow phantom models, each with 8 aneurysms of various sizes at different sites, were used in this study. The aneurysm models were identical except for an incremental increase in the sizes of the 8 aneurysms, which ranged from 0.4 mm to 2 mm. The phantoms were imaged on 1.5-T and 3-T MRI units with both time-of-flight (TOF) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Three independent expert neuroradiologists measured the aneurysms in a blinded manner using different measurement approaches. The individual and agreement detection rates of aneurysm enlargement among the 3 experts were calculated. RESULTS: The mean detection rate of any increase in any aneurysmal dimension was 95.7%. The detection rates of the 3 observers (observers A, B, and C) were 98.0%, 96.6%, and 92.7%, respectively (p = 0.22). The detection rates of each MRI modality were 91.3% using 1.5-T TOF, 97.2% using 1.5-T with Gd, 95.8% using 3.0-T TOF, and 97.2% using 3.0-T with Gd (p = 0.31). On the other hand, the mean detection rate for aneurysm enlargement was 54.8%. Specifically, the detection rates of observers A, B, and C were 49.0%, 46.1%, and 66.7%, respectively (p = 0.009). As the incremental enlargement value increased, the detection rate for aneurysm enlargement increased. The use of 1.5-T Gd improved the detection rate for small incremental enlargement (e.g., 0.4–1 mm) of the aneurysm (p = 0.04). The location of the aneurysm also affected the detection rate for aneurysm enlargement (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The detection rate and interobserver agreement were very high for aneurysm enlargement of 0.4–2 mm. The detection rate for at least 1 increase in any aneurysm dimension did not depend on the choice of MRI modality or measurement protocol. Use of Gd improved the accuracy of measurement. Aneurysm location may influence the accuracy of detecting enlargement.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Neurosurg

DOI

EISSN

1933-0693

Publication Date

March 9, 2018

Volume

130

Issue

2

Start / End Page

559 / 565

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Observer Variation
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography
  • Intracranial Aneurysm
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Nakagawa, D., Nagahama, Y., Policeni, B. A., Raghavan, M. L., Dillard, S. I., Schumacher, A. L., … Hasan, D. M. (2018). Accuracy of detecting enlargement of aneurysms using different MRI modalities and measurement protocols. J Neurosurg, 130(2), 559–565. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.9.JNS171811
Nakagawa, Daichi, Yasunori Nagahama, Bruno A. Policeni, Madhavan L. Raghavan, Seth I. Dillard, Anna L. Schumacher, Srivats Sarathy, et al. “Accuracy of detecting enlargement of aneurysms using different MRI modalities and measurement protocols.J Neurosurg 130, no. 2 (March 9, 2018): 559–65. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.9.JNS171811.
Nakagawa D, Nagahama Y, Policeni BA, Raghavan ML, Dillard SI, Schumacher AL, et al. Accuracy of detecting enlargement of aneurysms using different MRI modalities and measurement protocols. J Neurosurg. 2018 Mar 9;130(2):559–65.
Nakagawa, Daichi, et al. “Accuracy of detecting enlargement of aneurysms using different MRI modalities and measurement protocols.J Neurosurg, vol. 130, no. 2, Mar. 2018, pp. 559–65. Pubmed, doi:10.3171/2017.9.JNS171811.
Nakagawa D, Nagahama Y, Policeni BA, Raghavan ML, Dillard SI, Schumacher AL, Sarathy S, Dlouhy BJ, Wilson S, Allan L, Woo HH, Huston J, Cloft HJ, Wintermark M, Torner JC, Brown RD, Hasan DM. Accuracy of detecting enlargement of aneurysms using different MRI modalities and measurement protocols. J Neurosurg. 2018 Mar 9;130(2):559–565.

Published In

J Neurosurg

DOI

EISSN

1933-0693

Publication Date

March 9, 2018

Volume

130

Issue

2

Start / End Page

559 / 565

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Observer Variation
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography
  • Intracranial Aneurysm
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional
  • Humans