Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Anterior and Posterior Approaches for Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Quality Outcomes Database Analysis.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Wilkerson, CG; Sherrod, BA; Alvi, MA; Asher, AL; Coric, D; Virk, MS; Fu, K-M; Foley, KT; Park, P; Upadhyaya, CD; Knightly, JJ; Shaffrey, ME ...
Published in: World Neurosurg
April 2022

OBJECTIVE: Surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) may use anterior or posterior approaches. Our objective was to compare baseline differences and validated postoperative patient-reported outcome measures between anterior and posterior approaches. METHODS: The NeuroPoint Quality Outcomes Database was queried retrospectively to identify patients with symptomatic CSM treated at 14 high-volume sites. Demographic, comorbidity, socioeconomic, and outcome measures were compared between treatment groups at baseline and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the 1151 patients with CSM in the cervical registry, 791 (68.7%) underwent anterior surgery and 360 (31.3%) underwent posterior surgery. Significant baseline differences were observed in age, comorbidities, myelopathy severity, unemployment, and length of hospital stay. After adjusting for these differences, anterior surgery patients had significantly lower Neck Disability Index score (NDI) and a higher proportion reaching a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in NDI (P = 0.005 at 3 months; P = 0.003 at 12 months). Although modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores were lower in anterior surgery patients at 3 and 12 months (P < 0.001 and P = 0.022, respectively), no differences were seen in MCID or change from baseline. Greater EuroQol-5D improvement at 3 months after anterior versus posterior surgery (P = 0.024) was not sustained at 12 months and was insignificant on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest analysis to date of CSM surgery data, significant baseline differences existed for patients undergoing anterior versus posterior surgery for CSM. After adjusting for these differences, patients undergoing anterior surgery were more likely to achieve clinically significant improvement in NDI at short- and long-term follow-up.

Duke Scholars

Published In

World Neurosurg

DOI

EISSN

1878-8769

Publication Date

April 2022

Volume

160

Start / End Page

e436 / e441

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Spondylosis
  • Spinal Cord Diseases
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Humans
  • Cervical Vertebrae
  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1109 Neurosciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Wilkerson, C. G., Sherrod, B. A., Alvi, M. A., Asher, A. L., Coric, D., Virk, M. S., … Bisson, E. F. (2022). Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Anterior and Posterior Approaches for Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Quality Outcomes Database Analysis. World Neurosurg, 160, e436–e441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.049
Wilkerson, Christopher G., Brandon A. Sherrod, Mohammed Ali Alvi, Anthony L. Asher, Domagoj Coric, Michael S. Virk, Kai-Ming Fu, et al. “Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Anterior and Posterior Approaches for Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Quality Outcomes Database Analysis.World Neurosurg 160 (April 2022): e436–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.049.
Wilkerson, Christopher G., et al. “Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Anterior and Posterior Approaches for Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Quality Outcomes Database Analysis.World Neurosurg, vol. 160, Apr. 2022, pp. e436–41. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.049.
Wilkerson CG, Sherrod BA, Alvi MA, Asher AL, Coric D, Virk MS, Fu K-M, Foley KT, Park P, Upadhyaya CD, Knightly JJ, Shaffrey ME, Potts EA, Shaffrey C, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV, Chan AK, Bydon M, Tumialán LM, Bisson EF. Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Anterior and Posterior Approaches for Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Quality Outcomes Database Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2022 Apr;160:e436–e441.
Journal cover image

Published In

World Neurosurg

DOI

EISSN

1878-8769

Publication Date

April 2022

Volume

160

Start / End Page

e436 / e441

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Spondylosis
  • Spinal Cord Diseases
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Humans
  • Cervical Vertebrae
  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1109 Neurosciences