Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel
Journal cover image

Outcomes following redo sternotomy for aortic surgery.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Keeling, WB; Leshnower, BG; Thourani, VH; Kilgo, PS; Chen, EP
Published in: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
July 2012

Proximal thoracic aortic reconstruction performed with or without hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) is an effective surgical strategy for aortic pathology. In this study, the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing reoperative proximal thoracic aortic surgery were evaluated. A retrospective review was performed for reoperative proximal aortic surgery from 2004 to date. Patient data were abstracted from the society of thoracic surgeons (STS) institutional database and patient charts. Univariate analysis was conducted on the HCA group in order to determine the impact of variables on in-hospital mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated for long-term survival analysis. One hundred and twenty-two patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-seven (22.1%) were female, and the mean age was 53.8 years. Seventy-seven (63.1%) patients had an aortic root replacement, and 93 (76.2%) patients underwent aortic arch replacement. Circulatory arrest was performed in 92 (75.4%) patients. Operative mortality occurred in 14 patients (11.5%). Complications included re-exploration for haemorrhage (nine patients, 7.4%), stroke (four, 3.3%), renal failure (13, 10.7%) and major adverse events (18, 14.8%). Univariate and multivariate analyses of HCA patients showed cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, preoperative renal failure and prior coronary revascularization as independent predictors of mortality. Reoperative proximal aortic surgery can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality. These data also suggest that HCA represents a safe operative strategy for this patient population.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg

DOI

EISSN

1569-9285

Publication Date

July 2012

Volume

15

Issue

1

Start / End Page

63 / 68

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Sternotomy
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Respiratory System
  • Reoperation
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Multivariate Analysis
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Keeling, W. B., Leshnower, B. G., Thourani, V. H., Kilgo, P. S., & Chen, E. P. (2012). Outcomes following redo sternotomy for aortic surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 15(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivs127
Keeling, William B., Bradley G. Leshnower, Vinod H. Thourani, Patrick S. Kilgo, and Edward P. Chen. “Outcomes following redo sternotomy for aortic surgery.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 15, no. 1 (July 2012): 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivs127.
Keeling WB, Leshnower BG, Thourani VH, Kilgo PS, Chen EP. Outcomes following redo sternotomy for aortic surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Jul;15(1):63–8.
Keeling, William B., et al. “Outcomes following redo sternotomy for aortic surgery.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, vol. 15, no. 1, July 2012, pp. 63–68. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/icvts/ivs127.
Keeling WB, Leshnower BG, Thourani VH, Kilgo PS, Chen EP. Outcomes following redo sternotomy for aortic surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Jul;15(1):63–68.
Journal cover image

Published In

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg

DOI

EISSN

1569-9285

Publication Date

July 2012

Volume

15

Issue

1

Start / End Page

63 / 68

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Sternotomy
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Respiratory System
  • Reoperation
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Multivariate Analysis