Skip to main content

The hedonic consequences of punishment revisited

Publication ,  Journal Article
Wildeman, C; Turney, K; Schnittker, J
Published in: Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
February 12, 2014

In recent years, legal scholars have become acutely concerned with the hedonic consequences of incarceration. Despite this interest, no research has simultaneously tested (1) whether current incarceration and recent incarceration lead to declines in happiness, and (2) whether the direct effects of imprisonment (what Gresham Sykes referred to as the "pains of imprisonment") or the indirect effects of imprisonment (what scholars have come to call the "collateral consequences" of imprisonment) explain these effects, although there are compelling reasons to expect both. In this Article, we consider research on the causes of happiness and the consequences of incarceration to generate three hypotheses: the pains of imprisonment hypothesis, the incomplete adaptation hypothesis, and the selection hypothesis. We then use data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study and an array of rigorous statistical methods to isolate effects of current incarceration and recent incarceration on happiness. The results suggest that current incarceration has hedonic consequences, leading to statistically significant reductions in happiness across a range of statistical models. Indeed, current incarceration is the only factor more strongly correlated with current happiness than prior happiness. Furthermore, the indirect effects of imprisonment do little to explain these hedonic consequences, providing support for the pains of imprisonment hypothesis. The only inmates whose happiness does not follow this pattern were affectively unusual. They either disproportionately suffered from depression before incarceration or were profoundly unhappy prior to their incarceration (suggesting they had little possibility of becoming less happy while incarcerated). Recent incarceration, on the other hand, has no discernible effects on happiness after accounting for existing individual personality traits. Taken together, these results suggest that in terms of happiness lost, it is possible to match punishments with crimes. © 2014 by Northwestern University School of Law.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

ISSN

0091-4169

Publication Date

February 12, 2014

Volume

104

Issue

1

Start / End Page

133 / 163

Related Subject Headings

  • Criminology
  • 4805 Legal systems
  • 4804 Law in context
  • 4402 Criminology
  • 1801 Law
  • 1602 Criminology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Wildeman, C., Turney, K., & Schnittker, J. (2014). The hedonic consequences of punishment revisited. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 104(1), 133–163.
Wildeman, C., K. Turney, and J. Schnittker. “The hedonic consequences of punishment revisited.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 104, no. 1 (February 12, 2014): 133–63.
Wildeman C, Turney K, Schnittker J. The hedonic consequences of punishment revisited. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 2014 Feb 12;104(1):133–63.
Wildeman, C., et al. “The hedonic consequences of punishment revisited.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, vol. 104, no. 1, Feb. 2014, pp. 133–63.
Wildeman C, Turney K, Schnittker J. The hedonic consequences of punishment revisited. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 2014 Feb 12;104(1):133–163.

Published In

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

ISSN

0091-4169

Publication Date

February 12, 2014

Volume

104

Issue

1

Start / End Page

133 / 163

Related Subject Headings

  • Criminology
  • 4805 Legal systems
  • 4804 Law in context
  • 4402 Criminology
  • 1801 Law
  • 1602 Criminology