Effect of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Drug-Gene Interactions on Medication Selection and Remission of Symptoms in Major Depressive Disorder: The PRIME Care Randomized Clinical Trial.

Journal Article (Journal Article;Pragmatic Clinical Trial)

IMPORTANCE: Selecting effective antidepressants for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) is an imprecise practice, with remission rates of about 30% at the initial treatment. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pharmacogenomic testing affects antidepressant medication selection and whether such testing leads to better clinical outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A pragmatic, randomized clinical trial that compared treatment guided by pharmacogenomic testing vs usual care. Participants included 676 clinicians and 1944 patients. Participants were enrolled from 22 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers from July 2017 through February 2021, with follow-up ending November 2021. Eligible patients were those with MDD who were initiating or switching treatment with a single antidepressant. Exclusion criteria included an active substance use disorder, mania, psychosis, or concurrent treatment with a specified list of medications. INTERVENTIONS: Results from a commercial pharmacogenomic test were given to clinicians in the pharmacogenomic-guided group (n = 966). The comparison group received usual care and access to pharmacogenomic results after 24 weeks (n = 978). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The co-primary outcomes were the proportion of prescriptions with a predicted drug-gene interaction written in the 30 days after randomization and remission of depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (remission was defined as PHQ-9 ≤ 5). Remission was analyzed as a repeated measure across 24 weeks by blinded raters. RESULTS: Among 1944 patients who were randomized (mean age, 48 years; 491 women [25%]), 1541 (79%) completed the 24-week assessment. The estimated risks for receiving an antidepressant with none, moderate, and substantial drug-gene interactions for the pharmacogenomic-guided group were 59.3%, 30.0%, and 10.7% compared with 25.7%, 54.6%, and 19.7% in the usual care group. The pharmacogenomic-guided group was more likely to receive a medication with a lower potential drug-gene interaction for no drug-gene vs moderate/substantial interaction (odds ratio [OR], 4.32 [95% CI, 3.47 to 5.39]; P < .001) and no/moderate vs substantial interaction (OR, 2.08 [95% CI, 1.52 to 2.84]; P = .005) (P < .001 for overall comparison). Remission rates over 24 weeks were higher among patients whose care was guided by pharmacogenomic testing than those in usual care (OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.57]; P = .02; risk difference, 2.8% [95% CI, 0.6% to 5.1%]) but were not significantly higher at week 24 when 130 patients in the pharmacogenomic-guided group and 126 patients in the usual care group were in remission (estimated risk difference, 1.5% [95% CI, -2.4% to 5.3%]; P = .45). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with MDD, provision of pharmacogenomic testing for drug-gene interactions reduced prescription of medications with predicted drug-gene interactions compared with usual care. Provision of test results had small nonpersistent effects on symptom remission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03170362.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Oslin, DW; Lynch, KG; Shih, M-C; Ingram, EP; Wray, LO; Chapman, SR; Kranzler, HR; Gelernter, J; Pyne, JM; Stone, A; DuVall, SL; Lehmann, LS; Thase, ME; PRIME Care Research Group, ; Aslam, M; Batki, SL; Bjork, JM; Blow, FC; Brenner, LA; Chen, P; Desai, S; Dieperink, EW; Fears, SC; Fuller, MA; Goodman, CS; Graham, DP; Haas, GL; Hamner, MB; Helstrom, AW; Hurley, RA; Icardi, MS; Jurjus, GJ; Kilbourne, AM; Kreyenbuhl, J; Lache, DJ; Lieske, SP; Lynch, JA; Meyer, LJ; Montalvo, C; Muralidhar, S; Ostacher, MJ; Paschall, GY; Pfeiffer, PN; Prieto, S; Przygodzki, RM; Ranganathan, M; Rodriguez-Suarez, MM; Roggenkamp, H; Schichman, SA; Schneeweis, JS; Simonetti, JA; Steinhauer, SR; Suppes, T; Umbert, MA; Vassy, JL; Voora, D; Wiechers, IR; Wood, AE

Published Date

  • July 12, 2022

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 328 / 2

Start / End Page

  • 151 - 161

PubMed ID

  • 35819423

Pubmed Central ID

  • PMC9277497

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1538-3598

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1001/jama.2022.9805

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States