Detecting Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.

Journal Article (Review;Journal Article)

Objectives

To identify research and practice gaps to establish future research priorities to advance the detection of cognitive impairment and dementia in the emergency department (ED).

Design

Literature review and consensus-based rankings by a transdisciplinary, stakeholder task force of experts, persons living with dementia, and care partners.

Setting and participants

Scoping reviews focused on adult ED patients.

Methods

Two systematic scoping reviews of 7 medical research databases focusing on best tools and approaches for detecting cognitive impairment and dementia in the ED in terms of (1) most accurate and (2) most pragmatic to implement. The results were screened, reviewed, and abstracted for relevant information and presented at the stakeholder consensus conference for discussion and ranked prioritization.

Results

We identified a total of 1464 publications and included 45 to review for accurate tools and approaches for detecting cognitive impairment and dementia. Twenty-seven different assessments and instruments have been studied in the ED setting to evaluate cognitive impairment and dementia, with many focusing on sensitivity and specificity of instruments to screen for cognitive impairment. For pragmatic tools, we identified a total of 2166 publications and included 66 in the review. Most extensively studied tools included the Ottawa 3DY and Six-Item Screener (SIS). The SIS was the shortest to administer (1 minute). Instruments with the highest negative predictive value were the SIS (vs MMSE) and the 4 A's Test (vs expert diagnosis). The GEAR 2.0 Advancing Dementia Care Consensus conference ranked research priorities that included the need for more approaches to recognize more effectively and efficiently persons who may be at risk for cognitive impairment and dementia, while balancing the importance of equitable screening, purpose, and consequences of differentiating various forms of cognitive impairment.

Conclusions and implications

The scoping review and consensus process identified gaps in clinical care that should be prioritized for research efforts to detect cognitive impairment and dementia in the ED setting. These gaps will be addressed as future GEAR 2.0 research funding priorities.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Nowroozpoor, A; Dussetschleger, J; Perry, W; Sano, M; Aloysi, A; Belleville, M; Brackett, A; Hirshon, JM; Hung, W; Moccia, JM; Ohuabunwa, U; Shah, MN; Hwang, U; GEAR 2.0 ADC Network,

Published Date

  • August 2022

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 23 / 8

Start / End Page

  • 1314 - 1315.e55

PubMed ID

  • 35940682

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1538-9375

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 1525-8610

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.03.019

Language

  • eng