Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Bilateral implant reconstruction does not affect the quality of postmastectomy radiation therapy.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Ho, AY; Patel, N; Ohri, N; Morrow, M; Mehrara, BJ; Disa, JJ; Cordeiro, PG; Shi, W; Zhang, Z; Gelblum, D; Nerbun, CT; Woch, KM; Ballangrud, A ...
Published in: Med Dosim
2014

To determine if the presence of bilateral implants, in addition to other anatomic and treatment-related variables, affects coverage of the target volume and dose to the heart and lung in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). A total of 197 consecutive women with breast cancer underwent mastectomy and immediate tissue expander (TE) placement, with or without exchange for a permanent implant (PI) before radiation therapy at our center. PMRT was delivered with 2 tangential beams + supraclavicular lymph node field (50Gy). Patients were grouped by implant number: 51% unilateral (100) and 49% bilateral (97). The planning target volume (PTV) (defined as implant + chest wall + nodes), heart, and ipsilateral lung were contoured and the following parameters were abstracted from dose-volume histogram (DVH) data: PTV D95% > 98%, Lung V20Gy > 30%, and Heart V25Gy > 5%. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were performed to determine the association of variables with these parameters. The 2 groups were well balanced for implant type and volume, internal mammary node (IMN) treatment, and laterality. In the entire cohort, 90% had PTV D95% > 98%, indicating excellent coverage of the chest wall. Of the patients, 27% had high lung doses (V20Gy > 30%) and 16% had high heart doses (V25Gy > 5%). No significant factors were associated with suboptimal PTV coverage. On MVA, IMN treatment was found to be highly associated with high lung and heart doses (both p < 0.0001), but implant number was not (p = 0.54). In patients with bilateral implants, IMN treatment was the only predictor of dose to the contralateral implant (p = 0.001). In conclusion, bilateral implants do not compromise coverage of the target volume or increase lung and heart dose in patients receiving PMRT. The most important predictor of high lung and heart doses in patients with implant-based reconstruction, whether unilateral or bilateral, is treatment of the IMNs. Refinement of radiation techniques in reconstructed patients who require comprehensive nodal irradiation is warranted.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Med Dosim

DOI

EISSN

1873-4022

Publication Date

2014

Volume

39

Issue

1

Start / End Page

18 / 22

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Risk Factors
  • Radiotherapy, Conformal
  • Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Radiation Injuries
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • New York
  • Middle Aged
  • Mastectomy
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Ho, A. Y., Patel, N., Ohri, N., Morrow, M., Mehrara, B. J., Disa, J. J., … Powell, S. N. (2014). Bilateral implant reconstruction does not affect the quality of postmastectomy radiation therapy. Med Dosim, 39(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2013.08.008
Ho, Alice Y., Nisha Patel, Nisha Ohri, Monica Morrow, Babak J. Mehrara, Joseph J. Disa, Peter G. Cordeiro, et al. “Bilateral implant reconstruction does not affect the quality of postmastectomy radiation therapy.Med Dosim 39, no. 1 (2014): 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2013.08.008.
Ho AY, Patel N, Ohri N, Morrow M, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, et al. Bilateral implant reconstruction does not affect the quality of postmastectomy radiation therapy. Med Dosim. 2014;39(1):18–22.
Ho, Alice Y., et al. “Bilateral implant reconstruction does not affect the quality of postmastectomy radiation therapy.Med Dosim, vol. 39, no. 1, 2014, pp. 18–22. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2013.08.008.
Ho AY, Patel N, Ohri N, Morrow M, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Shi W, Zhang Z, Gelblum D, Nerbun CT, Woch KM, Ballangrud A, McCormick B, Powell SN. Bilateral implant reconstruction does not affect the quality of postmastectomy radiation therapy. Med Dosim. 2014;39(1):18–22.
Journal cover image

Published In

Med Dosim

DOI

EISSN

1873-4022

Publication Date

2014

Volume

39

Issue

1

Start / End Page

18 / 22

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Risk Factors
  • Radiotherapy, Conformal
  • Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Radiation Injuries
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • New York
  • Middle Aged
  • Mastectomy