Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Albright, BB; Witte, T; Tofte, AN; Chou, J; Black, JD; Desai, VB; Erekson, EA
Published in: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
January 2016

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and effectiveness of robotic vs laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease, as determined by randomized studies. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Controlled-Trials.com from study inception to October 9, 2014, using the intersection of the themes "robotic" and "hysterectomy." We included only randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of robotic vs laparoscopic hysterectomy in women for benign disease. Four trials met our inclusion criteria and were included in the analyses. We extracted data, and assessed the studies for methodological quality in duplicate. For meta-analysis, we used random effects to calculate pooled risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences. For our primary outcome, we used a modified version of the Expanded Accordion Severity Grading System to classify perioperative complications. We identified 41 complications among 326 patients. Comparing robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy, revealed no statistically significant differences in the rate of class 1 and 2 complications (RR, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-1.89) or in the rate of class 3 and 4 complications (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.22-4.40). Analyses of secondary outcomes were limited owing to heterogeneity, but showed no significant benefit of the robotic technique over the laparoscopic technique in terms of length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference, -0.39 day; 95% CI, -0.92 to 0.14 day), total operating time (weighted mean difference, 9.0 minutes; 95% CI, -31.27 to 47.26 minutes), conversions to laparotomy, or blood loss. Outcomes of cost, pain, and quality of life were reported inconsistently and were not amenable to pooling. Current evidence demonstrates neither statistically significant nor clinically meaningful differences in surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease. The role of robotic surgery in benign gynecology remains unclear.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Minim Invasive Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1553-4669

Publication Date

January 2016

Volume

23

Issue

1

Start / End Page

18 / 27

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Cervical Diseases
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Quality of Life
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Middle Aged
  • Length of Stay
  • Laparoscopy
  • Hysterectomy
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Albright, B. B., Witte, T., Tofte, A. N., Chou, J., Black, J. D., Desai, V. B., & Erekson, E. A. (2016). Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 23(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.003
Albright, Benjamin B., Tilman Witte, Alena N. Tofte, Jeremy Chou, Jonathan D. Black, Vrunda B. Desai, and Elisabeth A. Erekson. “Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23, no. 1 (January 2016): 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.003.
Albright BB, Witte T, Tofte AN, Chou J, Black JD, Desai VB, et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jan;23(1):18–27.
Albright, Benjamin B., et al. “Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.J Minim Invasive Gynecol, vol. 23, no. 1, Jan. 2016, pp. 18–27. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.003.
Albright BB, Witte T, Tofte AN, Chou J, Black JD, Desai VB, Erekson EA. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jan;23(1):18–27.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Minim Invasive Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1553-4669

Publication Date

January 2016

Volume

23

Issue

1

Start / End Page

18 / 27

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Cervical Diseases
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Quality of Life
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Middle Aged
  • Length of Stay
  • Laparoscopy
  • Hysterectomy
  • Humans