Skip to main content

Anchored Minimal Clinically Important Difference Metrics: Considerations for Bias and Regression to the Mean.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Tenan, MS; Simon, JE; Robins, RJ; Lee, I; Sheean, AJ; Dickens, JF
Published in: J Athl Train
September 1, 2021

Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) are used to understand clinical relevance. However, repeated observations produce biased analyses unless one accounts for baseline observation, known as regression to the mean (RTM). Using an International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) survey dataset, we can demonstrate the effect of RTM on MCID values by (1) MCID-estimate dependence on baseline observation and (2) MCID-estimate bias being higher when the posttest-pretest data correlation is lower. We created 10 IKDC datasets with 5000 patients and a specific correlation under both equal and unequal variances. For each 10-point increase in baseline IKDC, MCID decreased by 3.5, 2.7, 1.9, 1.2, and 0.7 points when posttest-pretest correlations were 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 0.90, respectively, under equal variances. Not accounting for RTM resulted in a static 20-point MCID. Minimal clinically important difference estimates may be unreliable. Minimal clinically important difference calculations should include the correlation and variances between posttest and pretest data, and researchers should consider using a baseline covariate-adjusted receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to calculate MCID.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Athl Train

DOI

EISSN

1938-162X

Publication Date

September 1, 2021

Volume

56

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1042 / 1049

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sport Sciences
  • Minimal Clinically Important Difference
  • Knee Joint
  • Knee
  • Humans
  • Benchmarking
  • 4207 Sports science and exercise
  • 4201 Allied health and rehabilitation science
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Tenan, M. S., Simon, J. E., Robins, R. J., Lee, I., Sheean, A. J., & Dickens, J. F. (2021). Anchored Minimal Clinically Important Difference Metrics: Considerations for Bias and Regression to the Mean. J Athl Train, 56(9), 1042–1049. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0368.20
Tenan, Matthew S., Janet E. Simon, Richard J. Robins, Ian Lee, Andrew J. Sheean, and Jonathan F. Dickens. “Anchored Minimal Clinically Important Difference Metrics: Considerations for Bias and Regression to the Mean.J Athl Train 56, no. 9 (September 1, 2021): 1042–49. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0368.20.
Tenan MS, Simon JE, Robins RJ, Lee I, Sheean AJ, Dickens JF. Anchored Minimal Clinically Important Difference Metrics: Considerations for Bias and Regression to the Mean. J Athl Train. 2021 Sep 1;56(9):1042–9.
Tenan, Matthew S., et al. “Anchored Minimal Clinically Important Difference Metrics: Considerations for Bias and Regression to the Mean.J Athl Train, vol. 56, no. 9, Sept. 2021, pp. 1042–49. Pubmed, doi:10.4085/1062-6050-0368.20.
Tenan MS, Simon JE, Robins RJ, Lee I, Sheean AJ, Dickens JF. Anchored Minimal Clinically Important Difference Metrics: Considerations for Bias and Regression to the Mean. J Athl Train. 2021 Sep 1;56(9):1042–1049.

Published In

J Athl Train

DOI

EISSN

1938-162X

Publication Date

September 1, 2021

Volume

56

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1042 / 1049

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sport Sciences
  • Minimal Clinically Important Difference
  • Knee Joint
  • Knee
  • Humans
  • Benchmarking
  • 4207 Sports science and exercise
  • 4201 Allied health and rehabilitation science
  • 3202 Clinical sciences